On Oct 9, 5:50 am, Matthias Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 05:15:49 +, gnuist006 wrote:
>
> >> Again I am depressed to encounter a fundamentally new concept that I
> >> was all
Special thanks to many of you for your very decent replies.
On Oct 9, 11:18 am, George Neuner wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 05:15:49 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Again I am depressed to encounter a fundamentally new concept that I
> >was all along unheard of. Its not even in paul graham's bo
On Oct 8, 11:09 pm, "." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 05:15:49 +, gnuist006 wrote:
>
> > Can anyone explain:
>
> > (1) its origin
>
> One of the lambda papers, I think. I don't remember which.
Hey no-name "dot" you
On Oct 8, 11:09 pm, "." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 05:15:49 +, gnuist006 wrote:
> > Again I am depressed to encounter a fundamentally new concept that I
> > was all along unheard of. Its not even in paul graham's book where i
> >
On Oct 8, 11:07 pm, Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Again I am depressed to encounter a fundamentally new concept that I
> > was all along unheard of.
>
> The concept is 37 years old. Wadsworth in his "Continuation
> Revisited" paper says he & Strachey were
On Oct 8, 10:59 pm, Barb Knox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Lambda calculus. Instead of function A returning to its caller, the
> caller provides an additional argument (the "continuation") which is a
> function B to be called by A with A's result(s). In pure "continuation
> style" coding, noth
Again I am depressed to encounter a fundamentally new concept that I
was all along unheard of. Its not even in paul graham's book where i
learnt part of Lisp. Its in Marc Feeley's video.
Can anyone explain:
(1) its origin
(2) its syntax and semantics in emacs lisp, common lisp, scheme
(3) Is it p
On Oct 8, 9:04 pm, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-10-09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does scheme have a gui library?
>
> Yes. It had a far, far better Tk binding than Python.
>
> http://kaolin.unice.fr/STk/
>
> I've used both for real-world applications,
On Oct 8, 1:23 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Harvey) wrote:
> "Kjetil S. Matheussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >I don't think your speculations makes very much sence.
>
> Amen.
>
> And, in any case, there's no need to speculate. MIT has published, on their
> web site, pages and pages of ratio
