On 22 Lug, 01:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
> If you do not get an answer here, file a bug report. If you can, put
> orsenthil,benjamin.peterson,ezio.melotti
> on the nosy list, as they are recent committers to this file. Say I said
> to do so if you want. Add tjreedy also so I can see responses and lea
On 22 Lug, 01:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
[cut]
> > Any hint?
>
> Remove the offending fake url.
This makes tests to pass, but I have concrete reasons to think that
urllib2 is really broken on my system. Btw, a(nother) weird thing is
that I wrote a standalone test file based on test_urllib2.py and the
On 20 Lug, 21:24, Terry Reedy wrote:
Hi Terry, thanks for your reply.
> > ==
> > ERROR: test_file (__main__.HandlerTests)
> > --
> > Traceback (most recent call
Hi, running Python 2.7 test suite for urllib2 there is a test that
doesn't pass.
Do you have an idea about where the problem could be and how to solve
it?
Thanks,
best regards.
$ # ubuntu 8.04
$ pwd
~/sandbox/2.7/lib/python2.7/test
$ python test_urllib2.py
Hi, suppose I have python 2.6.4 installed from source and I want to
upgrade to 2.6.5. Python standard library is automatically upgraded at
2.6.5 as well, while 3rd party pure Python and extension modules in
site-packages don't. Is it safe to keep the old site-packages or is it
suggested to reinstal
