On Oct 28, 3:24 pm, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
wrote:
> .
> On the other hand, AutoCAD allow people to customize it using other
> programming languages than AutoLisp, so I wouldn't expect it to be
> majoritary.
It is just a guess of the relative number of users.
--
http://
On Oct 28, 1:55 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the Elisp
> built into Emacs?
Surely surpassed by autolisp (a xlisp derivative inside the Autocad
engineering software).
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> Â Â Â Â Â | Â PLEASE DO NOT Â | Â Â Â Â Â Â :.:\:\:/:/:.:
> Â Â Â Â Â | Â FEED THE TROLLS Â | Â Â Â Â Â :=.' - Â - '.=:
I don't think Xah is trolling here (contrary to his/her habit)
but posing an interesting matter of discussion.
Don't know to which point it fits, but I w
