New submission from Lex Flagel :
It would be nice to make random.sample and random.choice both have the same
behavior with iterators. Currently random.sample accepts them happily, and
whereas random.choice does not. E.g.
> import random
> d = {'a':1, 'b':2}
> random.sample(d.keys
New submission from Lex Berezhny eukre...@gmail.com:
The following behavior doesn't make sense, especially since it works correctly
for other special attributes:
class F:
__name__ = Foo
F.__name__
'F'
F().__name__
'Foo'
F.__name__ = 'Foo'
F.__name__
'Foo'
Works fine
Changes by Lex Berezhny eukre...@gmail.com:
--
versions: +Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14092
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Lex Berezhny eukre...@gmail.com added the comment:
I think for __class__ it might make sense but for __name__ it seems not
intuitive.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14092
Lex Berezhny eukre...@gmail.com added the comment:
The one in __name__ since logically that happens after the class declaration
('class X' line) and should overwrite the name in the class declaration.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Lex Berezhny eukre...@gmail.com added the comment:
I don't particularly need this functionality. It was just something that seemed
counter intuitive to me.
I discovered this while working on a python to javascript compiler. I'll
probably implement the compiler to allow overriding
Hello!
Has anyone tried to build an implementation of subject in Python?
Any help is appreciated!
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...@netfront.net ---
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, 26 May 2010 05:26:56 -0700, alex23 wrote:
On May 26, 7:21 pm, Lex Lebedeff l...@from.hell wrote:
Has anyone tried to build an implementation of subject in Python? Any
help is appreciated!
http://www.dia.fi.upm.es/~jamartin/download.htm
Seriously, though, any reason why you
Probably not a big difference in most cases between debian, ubuntu,
fedora. The latter two may be more likely to have more recent
versions.
I'm pretty sure ubuntu is the only one which currently has python 3.0
in it's archives [no, it's not the default version].
On 06/01/2009, member thudfoo
I'm tryin to use regexp to replace multi-line c-style comments (like /* this
/n */ ) with /n (newlines).
I tried someting like re.sub('/\*(.*)/\*' , '/n' , file)
but it doesn't work for multiple lines.
besides that I want to keep all newlines as they were in the original file, so
I can
Of course there is the always the iteration method:
list = [1, True, True, False, False, True]
status = True
for each in list:
status = status and each
but what is your best way to test for for False in a list?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
the overall structure is up the creek.
approx 220 LOC.
file: GodCast.py
Cheers,
Lex.
#!/usr/bin/python
# GodCast: podcast aggregator!
# depends on wget lynx
# * one of the main features of GodCast is it's use of bandwidth.
#Many podcatchers
# http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid
12 matches
Mail list logo
