Re: The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding

2007-10-09 Thread nebulous99
On Oct 8, 7:32 am, Joost Kremers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Don't both "man" and those words for measurement come ultimately from > > words for "hand" (similarly to words like "manual", as in labor)? > > no. Do not bluntly contradict me in public. > "manual" is deri

Re: Car-ac-systems

2007-09-12 Thread nebulous99
On Sep 11, 9:35 am, "John Timney \(MVP\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do I control one with C# then! Thats not on your site, clearly not > everything I need to know then. Waste of a site! C# is just as off topic in comp.lang.java.programmer as car air- conditioning systems. The latter, howe

Re: The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding

2007-06-22 Thread nebulous99
On Jun 22, 6:32 pm, Cor Gest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > HOW IN THE BLOODY HELL IS IT SUPPOSED TO OCCUR TO SOMEONE TO ENTER > > THEM, GIVEN THAT THEY HAVE TO DO SO TO REACH THE HELP THAT WOULD TELL > > THEM THOSE ARE THE KEYS TO REACH THE HELP?! > > What's your problem ? > > Ofcourse a mere prog

Re: The Modernization of Emacs

2007-06-22 Thread nebulous99
On Jun 21, 10:48 am, Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bjorn Borud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> so if the context was system administration, I'd vote for vi as > >> well. if the context was programming I'd vote Emacs. > David Kastrup wrote: > > You know you can use something like > > C-x C-f /su