On Oct 10, 8:43 pm, Carl Banks wrote:
> On Oct 10, 2:26 am, niklasr wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 8, 10:17 pm, Carl Banks wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 8, 3:11 pm, niklasr wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
>
> > &g
On Oct 8, 8:33 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" wrote:
> En Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:11:04 -0300, niklasr escribió:
>
> > On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> >> NiklasRTZ schrieb:
> >> > Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is a
On Oct 8, 10:17 pm, Carl Banks wrote:
> On Oct 8, 3:11 pm, niklasr wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
>
> > > NiklasRTZ schrieb:
>
> > > > Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
> >
On Oct 8, 7:34 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> niklasr schrieb:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> >> NiklasRTZ schrieb:
>
> >>> Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
> >>>
On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> NiklasRTZ schrieb:
>
> > Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
> > restructuring datetime.datetime to datetime
> > Both works but only one should be chosen probably adjust my package to
> > comply to dependencies.
> > Spec i
