(obj);
Can't say I really understand it, though, all rather esoteric...
Peter
On Oct 1, 12:16 pm, pbienst peter.bienst...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is what I tried, but it prints out '-1':
PyObject* obj = PyRun_String(1, Py_single_input,
PyEval_GetGlobals(), PyEval_GetLocals());
long d
September 2010, it occurred to pbienst to exclaim:
Hi,
I'm embedding Python in a C app.
Say I do the following:
PyRun_SimpleString(a = 1)
Is there then a way to get access to the PyObject corresponding to a,
only making use in C of the fact that it's called a?
I've searched through
Hi,
I'm embedding Python in a C app.
Say I do the following:
PyRun_SimpleString(a = 1)
Is there then a way to get access to the PyObject corresponding to a,
only making use in C of the fact that it's called a?
I've searched through the API docs, but I couldn't really find what I
was looking
OK, thanks to the feedback from everyone I got the PUT from a client
to the WSGI server working.
I'm now trying to go the other way around: use a tar stream in one of
the functions in the WSGI server in order to send files to the client.
Problem is that the WSGI specs expects an iterator as
I would like to bundle up a number of files in a tar file and send it
over a HTTP connection, but I would like to do this without creating
the tar file on disk first.
I know I can get tarfile to output to a stream by doing something like
tar_pipe = tarfile.open(mode=w|, fileobj=my_file_obj)
Thanks for the tip! It doesn't change anything, though, so I've
debugged this a little bit further. The problem seems to be that the
receiving end (wsgi server) does not see the end of the data:
socket = environ[wsgi.input]
while True:
