On Sunday, February 28, 2016 at 12:04:52 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:07 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> >> Isn't there any good GUI IDE like Visual Basic? I hope there are some
> >> less well known GUI IDEs which I did not come across. Thanks.
> >
> > Sounds like
On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 2:47:53 PM UTC+5:30, subhaba...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I was trying to implement the code,
>
> import nltk
> import nltk.tag, nltk.chunk, itertools
> def ieertree2conlltags(tree, tag=nltk.tag.pos_tag):
> words, ents = zip(*tree.pos())
> iobs = []
> prev
On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 4:49:21 PM UTC+5:30, wrong.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I have some VB forms with more than a hundred objects. If I cannot drag and
> drop text boxes, list boxes, labels, etc., it will be too much work to create
> that with several lines of code for each object.
>
On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 10:55:02 AM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 8:07:03 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:08 am, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> >
> > > Seeing there is a lot of interest in asyncio r
On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 8:07:03 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:08 am, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> > Seeing there is a lot of interest in asyncio recently I figured people
> > might be interested in this
> >
On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 11:12:45 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Today I learned that **kwargs style keyword arguments can be any string:
>
>
> py> def test(**kw):
> ... print(kw)
> ...
> py> kwargs = {'abc-def': 42, '': 23, '---': 999, '123': 17}
> py> test(**kwargs)
> {'':
On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 6:48:12 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>
> But apart from that, I think that "teaching" versus "doing" language is a
> false dichotomy. Teaching languages should have a shallow learning curve
> (easy to get started and learn the language, easy
On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:22:10 PM UTC+5:30, Random832 wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 07:25, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > My beef is somewhat different: viz that post 70s (Pascal) and 80s
> > (scheme)
> > programming pedagogy has deteriorated with general purpose la
On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 12:17:26 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 February 2016 19:51, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> > I hope someone can help me find this link: There is some record that Guido
> > has said that python3 is probably a bit harder on
On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 10:54:43 AM UTC+5:30, John Ladasky wrote:
> On Monday, February 15, 2016 at 6:02:24 PM UTC-8, Rick Johnson wrote:
> > I don't need Python3. And i reckon that by the time i do,
> > something more interesting will come along, or, i'll create
> > something more
On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 8:04:42 AM UTC+1, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
> > According to TIOBE, Python's popularity continues to grow:
> > http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
>
> I wonder how much of that growth is Python 3 and how much is Python
On Monday, February 1, 2016 at 5:22:22 AM UTC+5:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 1/31/2016 5:34 PM, Fillmore wrote:
> > On 01/30/2016 05:26 AM, wxjmfauth wrote:
> >
> >>> Python 2 vs python 3 is anything but "solved".
> >> Python 3.5.1 is still suffering from the same buggy
> >> behaviour as in Python
On Sunday, January 31, 2016 at 11:15:50 PM UTC+5:30, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Rustom Mody writes:
> > I would guess it needs more recoding than explicit compilation!
> > Maybe something like http://www.colm.net/open-source/ragel/
> > Unfortunately no python binding so far :-(
On Monday, February 1, 2016 at 8:45:38 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> There are a lot of people here who post good content but phrase things
> poorly. And everyone has a bad day. (Terry Reedy, I'm hoping this was
> just a bad day - there were several rather caustic posts from you.
> Sorry to
True...
$ python
Python 2.7.10 (default, Oct 14 2015, 16:09:02)
[GCC 5.2.1 20151010] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import re
>>> re._MAXCACHE
100
But 100 is still large enough that for most normal users/uses re-compilation is
pointless.
On Sunday, January 31, 2016 at 7:27:06 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sunday 31 January 2016 09:18, Gregory Ewing wrote:
>
> > Rustom Mody wrote:
> >> 1. One can use string-re's instead of compiled re's
> >
> > And I gather that string REs are compile
On Sunday, January 31, 2016 at 9:18:31 AM UTC+5:30, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 30Jan2016 19:22, rusi wrote:
> >Python 3.4.3+ (default, Oct 14 2015, 16:03:50)
> >[GCC 5.2.1 20151010] on linux
> >Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> python.el: native
On Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 3:01:09 AM UTC+5:30, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Friday, January 29, 2016 at 6:21:21 AM UTC-6, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> > I nearly gave up with Python at the very beginning before
> > I realised that OO-programming is optional in Python! :-)
> > Most tutorials I found
On Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 3:01:09 AM UTC+5:30, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Friday, January 29, 2016 at 6:21:21 AM UTC-6, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> > I nearly gave up with Python at the very beginning before
> > I realised that OO-programming is optional in Python! :-)
> > Most tutorials I found
On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 10:51:17 AM UTC+5:30, namenob...@gmail.com
wrote:
> hi
>
> is there something analogous to sys.platform that lets you get the version of
> python you're using? sorry if the question is too see-spot-run. thanks if you
> can help
>
> peace
> stm
You want this??
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 9:16:13 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 25, 2016 2:04 AM, "Frank Millman" wrote:
> >>
> >> "Ian Kelly" wrote in message
> >>>
> >>> This seems to be a common misapprehension about asyncio programming.
> >>>
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 1:59:15 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Ben Finney :
>
> > The author points out there are times when a code base is large and
> > complex enough that refactoring puts the programmer in a state of not
> > knowing whether they're making progress, because until
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 4:49:19 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> > The knowhow, vision and skill is apparently very rare. On the product
> > management side, we have the famous case of Steve Jobs, who simply told
> > the
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 7:13:49 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Rustom Mody :
>
> > IOW anyone who thinks that *arbitrary* complexity can *always* be
> > tamed either has a visa to utopia or needs to re-evaluate (or get) a
> > CS degree
>
> Not all com
On Friday, May 31, 2013 at 1:06:29 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 10:12:22 -0700, rusi wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
>
> >> Wait a minute! Isn't the most nature way of doing/thinking "generating
> >> 9x9 multiplication table" two
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 6:05:02 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > 2. My students trying to work inside the lexer made a mess because the
> > extant lexer is a mess.
> > I.e. while python(3) *claims* to
On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 7:53:07 PM UTC+5:30, Charles T. Smith wrote:
> What does "from (module) import (func)" do?
>
> Please don't tell me that I shouldn't ask because real programmers
> know not to have circular dependencies ...
>
> I have no idea what was imported before. I just
oint, you are already using OOP, and you may want to
> formalize that in a class.
>HTH
On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 12:01:29 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 10:57:23 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 January 2016
On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 1:00:13 PM UTC+5:30, Arshpreet Singh wrote:
> Hello Friends, I am quite new to OOP(object oriented Programming), I did some
> projects with python which includes Data-Analysis, Flask Web Development and
> some simple scripts.
>
> I have only one question which is
On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 10:57:23 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 14:36, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> > 1. Python the LANGUAGE, is rather even-handed in paradigm choice: Choose
> > OO, imperative, functional or whatever style pleases/suits
On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 6:32:14 PM UTC+5:30, navneet bhatele wrote:
> I have been trying to install the "python-3.5.1-amd64-webinstall " many
> times and the Set up failed is shown up with named 0*80070002 - file
> doesn't exist in dialog box
Which windows?
XP and 3.5 are not compatible
On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 7:30:10 AM UTC+5:30, jf...@ms4.hinet.net wrote:
> It lets you jump between the current cursor position and the line the upper
> level indentation start, something like the bracket matching in C editor.
> Because of Python use indentation as its code block mark, It
On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 7:16:23 AM UTC+5:30, Robert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see below code snippet. The return line is not as the usual type.
>
>
>
> def make_cov(cov_type, n_comp, n_fea):
> mincv = 0.1
> rand = np.random.random
> return {
> 'spherical': (mincv + mincv *
On Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 6:48:28 PM UTC+5:30, mviljamaa wrote:
> I'm forming sets by set.adding to sets and this leads to sets such as:
>
> Set([ImmutableSet(['a', ImmutableSet(['a'])]), ImmutableSet(['b',
> 'c'])])
>
> Is there way union these to a single set, i.e. get
>
> Set(['a',
On Monday, January 4, 2016 at 11:23:24 AM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Monday, January 4, 2016 at 10:49:39 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:27 am, Ben Finney wrote:
> >
> > > If I could have the traceback continue into the C code and tel
On Thursday, December 31, 2015 at 9:05:58 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> But I think it is a real issue. I believe in beautiful tracebacks that give
> you just the right amount of information, neither too little nor two much.
> Debugging is hard enough with being given more information than
On Monday, January 4, 2016 at 10:49:39 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:27 am, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > If I could have the traceback continue into the C code and tell me the
> > line of C code that raised the exception, *that's* what I'd choose.
>
> If you are serious
On Monday, January 4, 2016 at 10:49:39 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:27 am, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > If I could have the traceback continue into the C code and tell me the
> > line of C code that raised the exception, *that's* what I'd choose.
>
> If you are serious
On Monday, January 4, 2016 at 9:02:16 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 31, 2015 at 9:05:58 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano
> > wrote:
> >> But I think it is a real issue. I believe in beauti
On Monday, January 4, 2016 at 11:42:51 AM UTC+5:30, Dan Sommers wrote:
> > I'm saddened but not astonished at just how much opposition there is
> > to point (1) ...
>
> I'll echo the sentiment that we're all adults here, and my opinion that
> if you're reading tracebacks, then you want as much
On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 6:14:24 PM UTC+5:30, Robert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read a code snippet, in which object w_A is:
>
>
> w_A
> Out[48]: array([ 0.10708809, 0.94933575, 0.8412686 , 0.03280939,
> 0.59985308])
>
>
> Then, I don't know what is '[: ' below:
> vs_A = w_A[:, None] *
On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 11:26:55 PM UTC+5:30, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to see instruction execution enhanced with the following two ideas:
>
> 1. A termination bit, and a terminator pointer.
> 2. A alternation bit, and a alternate pointer.
>
> The purpose of these
On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 12:04:18 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> >> At
> >> https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-obj
On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 11:09:17 AM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 06:11, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > At
> > https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-object-class-with-some-methods-implemented-in-c-and-others-in-python-e-g-thro
At
https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-object-class-with-some-methods-implemented-in-c-and-others-in-python-e-g-through-inheritance
it says
In Python 2.2, you can inherit from built-in classes such as int, list, dict,
etc.
So is it 3.5 or 2.2?
For some reason google
At
https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-object-class-with-some-methods-implemented-in-c-and-others-in-python-e-g-through-inheritance
it says
In Python 2.2, you can inherit from built-in classes such as int, list, dict,
etc.
So is it 3.5 or 2.2?
For some reason google
On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 1:14:05 AM UTC+5:30, Tim wrote:
> And that seems to work, but after reading more from the Python Packaging
> Authority, I wonder if that is the right way. Should I be using wheels
> instead?
> I think my brain fried a little bit while going through the doc.
You
On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 7:18:11 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 10:12 pm, Laura Creighton wrote:
>
> > Actually, the fact that adults have more difficulty processing
> > negations is one of the earliest things proven experimentally
> > in experimental psychology.
>
On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 7:58:34 AM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 7:18:11 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > and some negations may technically be harder to understand, but in a
> > practical sense the difference may be negligible:
> &g
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 10:02:40 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 02:42 pm, Random832 wrote:
>
> > Anyway, maybe we do need a term to distinguish Python/C#/Java pointers
> > from C/C++ pointers - maybe call it a "non-arithmetic" pointer, since
> > the key thing
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 9:47:33 PM UTC+5:30, rurpy wrote:
> Frankly, I feel a little insulted by people who presume that having
> learned what a pointer is in C, that my brain is so rigid that I must
> necessarily think that pointer means exactly what pointer means in C
> forever
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 11:26:18 PM UTC+5:30, Akira Li wrote:
> Rustom Mody writes:
>
> > On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 8:11:49 PM UTC+5:30, Laura Creighton
> > wrote:
> >> In a message of Sat, 12 Sep 2015 05:46:35 -0700, Rustom Mody writes:
> >
On Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 4:05:21 AM UTC+5:30, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 09/12/2015 04:14 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> > On 9/12/2015 12:58 PM, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
> >
> >> The question is whether what "pointer" means in languages that use the
> >> word is*so* different
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 10:21:08 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Python values are not addresses. Python values are objects.
Which means for example...???
Atoms? Stars? People? Countries?
> Addresses, even when they exist, are not accessible in the Python language.
And you
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 10:38:46 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 10:46 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 11:57:01 AM UTC+5:30, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> >> You've clearly committed to some ontology
On Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 5:32:44 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> In its implementation, CPython uses pointers. But if you say that Python
> has pointers because CPython uses pointers, then you might as well say
> that Python is statically typed because the CPython source has type
>
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 8:11:49 PM UTC+5:30, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Sat, 12 Sep 2015 05:46:35 -0700, Rustom Mody writes:
> >How about lay-English ontology in which "point to" and "refer to" are fairly
> >synonymous?
>
> T
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 11:57:01 AM UTC+5:30, Ben Finney wrote:
> Random832 writes:
>
> > Ben Finney writes:
> > > The reference value is inaccessible to the program, it can only be
> > > used to get at the referenced object.
> >
> > What does it mean to access something, if not to do
On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 12:53:28 AM UTC+5:30, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-09-10, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > I have a function which is intended for use at the interactive interpreter,
> > but may sometimes be used non-interactively. I wish to change it's output
> > depending on the
On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 9:27:46 PM UTC+5:30, rand...@fastmail.us wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015, at 11:55, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > > Ah, that makes sense. It's writing into the dict that is created and
> > > returned by locals(), but
On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 10:04:25 AM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Ian Kelly :
>
> > You can use tabs *or* spaces. If you want to mix the two, then there
> > would need to be some official decision made about how many spaces
> > compose a tab, and then everybody who wants to use tabs
On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 12:53:28 AM UTC+5:30, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-09-10, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > I have a function which is intended for use at the interactive interpreter,
> > but may sometimes be used non-interactively. I wish to change it's output
> > depending on the
On Sunday, September 6, 2015 at 8:05:28 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 01:18 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> > Here's mergesort written in various languages
> > http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Sorting_algorithms/Merge_sort
> >
> > You could look
On Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 7:24:47 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Indeed. The key to being a good programmer is not "write your code
> despite the language you're using", but "write the code in the
> language you're using".
>
A thought experiment for you Chris!
Here's mergesort
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 10:37:04 AM UTC+5:30, Phuong Phan wrote:
> Hi Python community,
Hi Phuong Phan
> I am new to Python and currently taking one online course of computer science
> and programming using Python. I really like Python because it is simple and
> clarity but powerful
On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 12:54:08 PM UTC+5:30, Jahn wrote:
> 1.
> How can I save 256 lists, each list has 32 values( hexadecimal numbers)
> 2.
> How to compare the saved lists with another 256 lists ( that are read online
> and have the
> same structure as the list one)?
> ( the first
On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 3:46:15 AM UTC+5:30, Laura Creighton wrote:
> Can you make the effort to move your cursor to the bottom of
> the mail you are replying to, before you start typing,
> so that your reply comes after what was said before, instead of
> first thing, and thus before what
On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 11:56:53 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Completely off-topic. Stop reading now if you only want to read things about
Python.
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:46 am, Ben Finney wrote:
\ “Of course, everybody says they're for peace. Hitler was for |
`\
On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 8:59:44 PM UTC+5:30, Ben Finney wrote:
Terry Reedy writes:
I disagree with prohibiting people encumbered by such systems from
participating.
I have no power to prohibit people here. I do strongly request that such
threatening legalistic screeds stay
On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 9:03:52 PM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
While it's true this particular problem is possibly beyond the scope of
this python list (and may not be python-related at all), it's too bad a
couple of people have taken the time to reply to your queries to simply
On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 6:32:56 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 9:53 AM, sohcahtoa82 wrote:
On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 3:42:36 PM UTC-7, hamilton wrote:
On 8/21/2015 1:41 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Python 3.5 does not support Windows XP.
Is there a
On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 3:40:11 AM UTC+5:30, Ping Liu wrote:
Hi, Dieter,
If I move from Python to Jython or IronPython, do I need to retool whatever I
have done? If so, that may take quite a long time. This may make the
reimplementation impossible.
Hi Ping
There is a message from
On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 7:32:08 PM UTC+5:30, Владислав wrote:
# first: works fine
x = [1, 2, 4, 2, 1, 3]
x = list(set(x))
x.sort()
print(x) # output: 1, 2, 3, 4
# second: why x became None ??
x = [1, 2, 4, 2, 1, 3]
x = list(set(x)).sort()
print(x) # output: None
I know that
On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 10:35:48 AM UTC+5:30, rurpy wrote:
I hope someday Python gets a decent packaging/distribution story.
You are in august company
| The final question was about what he (Guido) hates in Python. Anything to do
| with package distribution, he answered immediately. There
On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 10:10:18 PM UTC+5:30, AGOSTINHO TEIXEIRA wrote:
I'm a 25year DBASE-5 DOS programmer and want/have to step over to new
program/platform software, because there is no future anymore for DOS after
W-XP, I've been looking around for alternatives and cannot figure out
On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 7:30:14 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:16 AM, shiva upreti wrote:
I am new to linux. I tried various things in attempt to install kivy. I
installed python 2.7.10 (I think python3 was already installed in ubuntu
14.04). Then i
On Saturday, August 15, 2015 at 5:12:13 AM UTC+5:30, Alex Glaros wrote:
3. Could not find Laura's response. Was it deleted?
I dont see it either. I expect its in some other thread
Laura's mail client is doing funny things to threading...
Something Ive been noticing for a few days
--
On Friday, August 14, 2015 at 6:35:27 AM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 08/10/2015 10:08 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 8:59:47 AM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 08/10/2015 07:49 PM, Dwight GoldWinde wrote:
Thank you, Gary, for this new information.
I
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 8:59:47 AM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 08/10/2015 07:49 PM, Dwight GoldWinde wrote:
Thank you, Gary, for this new information.
I will be looking into virtualenv and vertualenvwrapper.
I thought that Django was an IDE. But, it seems that an IDE is
On Sunday, August 9, 2015 at 2:57:20 AM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Marko Rauhamaa :
Steven D'Aprano :
The contemporary standard approach is from Zermelo-Fraenkel set
theory: define 0 as the empty set, and the successor to n as the
union of n and the set containing n:
0 = {}
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 6:58:01 PM UTC+5:30, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2015-08-02 12:11, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
There are a lot of ways to store configuration information:
- conf file
- xml file
- database
- json file
- and possible a lot of other ways
I want to write a Python
On Sunday, August 2, 2015 at 3:44:51 PM UTC+5:30, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
There are a lot of ways to store configuration information:
- conf file
- xml file
- database
- json file
- and possible a lot of other ways
One that I dont think has been mentioned:
ast.literal_eval
--
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 7:38:46 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:46 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Sunday, August 2, 2015 at 3:44:51 PM UTC+5:30, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
There are a lot of ways to store configuration information:
- conf file
- xml file
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 8:43:31 PM UTC+5:30, jennyf...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to learn differences between tail recursion and non tail
recursion.
Is the following recursive code tail recursive?
If it is not how to convert it to tail recursion?
If it is how to convert it to
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 9:07:52 PM UTC+5:30, jennyf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 9:21:33 AM UTC-6, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 8:43:31 PM UTC+5:30, jennyf...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am trying to learn differences between tail recursion
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 10:11:30 PM UTC+5:30, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 10:29:21 AM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
1 + x
does not *call* 1 .__add__(x)
It *is* that
[Barring corner cases of radd etc]
IOW I am
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 6:32:03 AM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
By contrast here is a more friendly error message (had put a comma where a
colon
required)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
File /usr/lib/python3.4/ast.py, line 46, in literal_eval
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 2:31:52 AM UTC+5:30, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2015-08-05 06:37, Rustom Mody wrote:
config = {}
with open('config.ini') as f:
for row in f:
row = row.strip()
if not row or row.startswith(('#', ';')):
continue
k, _, v
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 6:36:56 AM UTC+5:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
There have been discussions, such as today on Idle-sig , about who uses
Idle and who we should design it for. If you use Idle in any way, or
know of or teach classes using Idle, please answer as many of the
questions
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 7:49:10 AM UTC+5:30, Mario Figueiredo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Mario Figueiredo mar...@gmail.com wrote:
But being an asshole does not. That is something one chooses to become.
Your answer squarely puts you in the group of people that chose to
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 10:19:11 AM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 08/04/2015 08:44 PM, wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015, at 21:32, Michael Torrie wrote:
In many of my projects I put basic config variables in a file like
config.py and import that in each module that needs it. The
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 10:07:37 PM UTC+5:30, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 7/29/2015 10:52 AM, Joe Sanders wrote:
Hello- Which Python do I need for the below? with instructions please!
[cid:image001.png@01D0C9FD.677CDED0]
Seeing that you have no responses yet I'm guessing most
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 9:28:56 PM UTC+5:30, Ben Iannitelli wrote:
Everyone else: sorry if I messed up with this post somehow, it's my first
time writing back to anyone on the newsletter.
Its fine
Thanks for trying to help
[Just try to (hard)break your lines at around 72 columns/chars
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 12:03:36 PM UTC+5:30, Paul Rubin wrote:
The final question was about what he hates in Python. Anything to do
with package distribution, he answered immediately. There are problems
with version skew and dependencies that just make for an endless
mess. He dreads it
On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 6:15:56 AM UTC+5:30, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 29Jul2015 18:32, Laura Creighton wrote:
These control characters are the very basic move characters in emacs.
People have always been free to remap them if they want them to do
something else, but waking up in the
On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 6:45:45 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Victor Hooi wrote:
I have a line that looks like this:
14 *0330 *0 760 411|0 0 770g 1544g 117g
1414 computedshopcartdb:103.5% 0
On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 4:37:22 AM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
I don't entirely disagree. I think that the implementation of async
coroutines on top of synchronous coroutines on top of generators is
overly clever and results in a somewhat leaky abstraction and a fair
amount of confusion.
Hear
:
Rustom Mody writes:
On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 2:06:00 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
What would you like to achieve, exactly?
Some attitude correction?
With all respect, take your own advice. And use an editor that works for
you.
Sorry if I seemed insulting to you
On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 4:13:17 PM UTC+5:30, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
Rustom Mody writes:
On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 2:06:00 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
What would you like to achieve, exactly?
Some attitude correction?
With all respect, take your own advice. And use
On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 2:06:00 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Rustom Mody :
Emacs 'tries to be everything' in exactly the same way that a 'general
purpose programming language' is too general and by pretending to
solve all problems actually solves none (until you hire
601 - 700 of 1777 matches
Mail list logo
