Re: Can .py be complied?

2005-04-28 Thread steve.leach
python -o foo.exe foo.py at the command line, and get an executable, without any further effort. Hence making the resulting program useless to users of most operating systems. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Can .py be complied?

2005-04-27 Thread steve.leach
Harlin Seritt wrote: Hi monkey, Not a stupid question especially if you're trying to create commercial software and don't want to reveal your source. At any rate, you can use py2exe to create a .exe file. It does have some cons to it since you Some very severe cons considering that would mean his

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-25 Thread steve.leach
dcrespo wrote: Hi all... I think wxPython is much better than PyGTK. First of all, PyGTK needs the GTK runtime installed, whereas wxPython is entirely Python's And depending on your platform, wxPython also requires GTK installed. wxWindows is a wrapper for different GUI toolkits. On Windows, it

How standard is the standard library?

2005-04-18 Thread steve.leach
Newbie question: Looking through my stack of books and various on-line references, I have seen several libraries and library functions listed as depreciated. Is there a road map or concrete list of what parts of the standard library are to be considered reliable and permanent? Coming from C,