Steven Bethard wrote:
> the.theorist wrote:
> > I was writing a small script the other day with the following CLI
> > prog [options] [file]*
> >
> > I've used getopt to parse out the possible options, so we'll ignore
> > that part, and assume for the res
I was writing a small script the other day with the following CLI
prog [options] [file]*
I've used getopt to parse out the possible options, so we'll ignore
that part, and assume for the rest of the discussion that args is a
list of file names (if any provided).
I used this bit of code to detect
Boy, do I feel sheepish. Yes, what I wanted were Literals. That
clarifies things greatly. Thank you.
Also, I went browsing around further, and found on O'reilly's CodeZoo:
Most of the methods in the pyparsing module are very easy to figure
out. Forward() might not be as obvious. To get going with
Sorry, got a bit of formatting wrong. Messed up what I was really
trying to point out.
container_tag << Group(open_tag + OneOrMore(container_tag | content)
# ^name^recursive reference
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Looks like the fundamental error was in my understanding.
Boy, do I feel sheepish. Yes, what I wanted were Literals.
That clarifies things greatly. Thank you.
Also, I went browsing around further, and found on O'reilly's CodeZoo:
Most of the methods in the pyparsing module are very easy to figure
Hey, I'm trying my hand and pyparsing a log file (named l.log):
FIRSTLINE
PROPERTY1 DATA1
PROPERTY2 DATA2
PROPERTYS LIST
ID1 data1
ID2 data2
ID1 data11
ID2 data12
SECTION
So I wrote up a small bit of code (named p.py):
from pyparsing im
So that it'll be easier to remember the next time I find myself in the
same situation on a different task, I'll extend the discussion
somewhat.
Coming from C, I had expected that I'd get a new empty dict every time
the __init__ function ran. Guido (or some other benevolent) had decided
to implemen
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> the.theorist a écrit :
> > I have a small, simple class which contains a dictionary (and some
> > other stuff, not shown). I then have a container class (Big) that holds
> > some instances of the simple class. When I try to edit the elements of
&g
I have a small, simple class which contains a dictionary (and some
other stuff, not shown). I then have a container class (Big) that holds
some instances of the simple class. When I try to edit the elements of
the dictionary, all instances obtain those changes; I want each
instance to hold separate
