On Feb 4, 3:11 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> thmpsn@gmail.com a écrit :
>
>
>
> > On Feb 3, 1:14 am, David Cournapeau wrote:
> (snip)
> >> after all, we have used FILE* for years and I have no idea about the FILE
> >> structure.
>
> > Your lack of knowledge about it doesn't mean that it ha
On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:36 AM, wrote:
> > On Feb 3, 1:14 am, David Cournapeau wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Russ P. wrote:
> >> > On Feb 2, 7:48 pm, "Rhodri James" wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:16:01 -, Russ P.
> >> >>
On Feb 3, 1:14 am, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Russ P. wrote:
> > On Feb 2, 7:48 pm, "Rhodri James" wrote:
> >> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:16:01 -, Russ P. wrote:
> >> > Here we go again. If you have access to the source code (as you nearly
> >> > always do with Py
On Feb 2, 2:55 am, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> > This is proven
> > by your statement above, whereby you are driving a user away,
> > simply because the language, in one small aspect, does not
> > give him what he wants, and the tenor of this thread has been
> > very much: "That's how it is - like it
On Feb 1, 1:50 am, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:28:14 -0800, thmpsn.m.k wrote:
> > On Jan 31, 2:27 pm, Christian Heimes wrote:
> >> Do you honestly believe that C++'s private members are really private?
> >> Privateness is only enforced during parsing time. Nobody can
On Jan 31, 2:27 pm, Christian Heimes wrote:
> thmpsn@gmail.com schrieb:
>
> > But it's only a faking, and things such as inheritance and
> > polymorphism are implemented clumsily (actually I'm not even sure
> > about polymorphism). And of course, there are still no private
> > members.
>
> Do
On Jan 30, 2:32 pm, Michael Torrie wrote:
> Veerendra Ganiger wrote:
> > Python is not purely object oriented programming, because we can write
> > functions without any class.
> > You are right, predefined class attributes are available when we write or
> > execute a piece of python code without
On Jan 30, 12:15 am, Chris Rebert wrote:
> - Python supports encapsulation. Prefixing an attribute/method with an
> underscore indicates that other programmers should treat it as
> 'private'. However, unlike B&D languages, Python itself does nothing
> to enforce this privacy, leaving it instead to
I've just downloaded Python's mainstream implementation (CPython),
which is written in C. Not to my surprise, I feel like I'm looking at
unstructured spaghetti, and I'm having trouble figuring out how it all
works together. (Please bear with me; I'm just going through the usual
frustration that any
