umaxx m...@umaxx.net added the comment:
@BreamoreBoy: what do you man by taking this forward?
The patch is there. Since three years now, no one else seems to be interested.
I personally do not have any interest in this anymore as I just do not use
Python for this stuff anymore since a long
umaxx um...@oleco.net added the comment:
Looking at the patch, the recorded seek points will probably be wrong if
some newlines were translated (e.g. '\r\n' - '\n') when reading the file.
ack, this could be a problem.
I'm also not sure not what the use case for very big files
umaxx added the comment:
oops... i looked at python 2.4, not the latest trunk. my fault :(
please close this issue.
sorry for the noise...
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1709
New submission from umaxx:
here comes a simple patch for linecache core module, which does the
following:
- remove double comment
- instead of adding all lines with readlines() to the cache, just add
seek points for every line
- return lines from cached seek-points instead directly from dict
New submission from umaxx:
logging does not have a (formatter) option for logging the actual
function name
Logger class detects function name with findCaller() - *but* does not
pass it to the makeRecord()-call in _log() - why?
would be nice to see this feature implemented, no patch for now
