On 06/02/18 10:23, alister via Python-list wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2018 08:55:35 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Ben Finney
wrote:
Chris Angelico writes:
As one special case, I would accept this sort of code:
def f():
...
(three dots representing the speci
On Tue, 06 Feb 2018 08:55:35 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Ben Finney
> wrote:
>> Chris Angelico writes:
>>
>>> As one special case, I would accept this sort of code:
>>>
>>> def f():
>>> ...
>>>
>>> (three dots representing the special value Ellipsis)
>>>
>>
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Chris Angelico writes:
>
>> As one special case, I would accept this sort of code:
>>
>> def f():
>> ...
>>
>> (three dots representing the special value Ellipsis)
>>
>> It's a great short-hand for "stub".
>
> I would not accept that.
>
> An
Chris Angelico writes:
> As one special case, I would accept this sort of code:
>
> def f():
> ...
>
> (three dots representing the special value Ellipsis)
>
> It's a great short-hand for "stub".
I would not accept that.
An even better way to write a stub function is to write a docstring:
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 6:47 AM, Alain Ketterlin
wrote:
> r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
>
>> A participant of my Python course asked whether one could
>> also use "None" instead of "pass". What do you think?
>>
>> def f():
>> pass
>>
>> can also be written as
>>
>> def f():
r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
> A participant of my Python course asked whether one could
> also use "None" instead of "pass". What do you think?
>
> def f():
> pass
>
> can also be written as
>
> def f():
> None
>
> . Is there any place where "None" could not be use
