Re: [OT] Chaos Theory [was Re: Benefit and belief]

2011-10-01 Thread Steven D'Aprano
Gregory Ewing wrote: > Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> By the way, who removed the OT label from the subject line? > > Probably nobody "removed" it, they just replied to some earlier > message that didn't have it. I started the "Benefit and belief" sub-thread, changing the subject line from "suggested

Re: [OT] Chaos Theory [was Re: Benefit and belief]

2011-10-01 Thread Gregory Ewing
Steven D'Aprano wrote: By the way, who removed the OT label from the subject line? Probably nobody "removed" it, they just replied to some earlier message that didn't have it. Despite the term, a newsgroup thread is not a linear structure, it's a tree. Changing the subject line on one branch d

[OT] Chaos Theory [was Re: Benefit and belief]

2011-10-01 Thread Steven D'Aprano
By the way, who removed the OT label from the subject line? Please don't unless it actually comes back on topic. DevPlayer wrote: > I still assert that contradiction is caused by narrow perspective. There's no doubt that some *apparent* contradictions are caused by lack of correct information.