Re: [Python-ideas] Re: Automatic translation of Python to assembly language

2019-09-09 Thread Gregory Ewing
Mark at PysoniQ.com wrote: > an extension (.dll or .so) is not generally included in a > makefile because it's dynamically linked and not incorporated into an > executable -- which Python doesn't have. If I change the source, the .dll or .so needs to be re-created. That's a build step, and as suc

Re: [Python-ideas] Re: Automatic translation of Python to assembly language

2019-09-08 Thread Roel Schroeven
Skip Montanaro schreef op 8/09/2019 om 21:17: ChrisA> Your blog breaks the browser's Back button. Please don't do that; if ChrisA> you want people to read your content, make it easy for us to do so. Mark, I didn't even go that far. If you want me to read your blog, please load the individual es

Re: [Python-ideas] Re: Automatic translation of Python to assembly language

2019-09-08 Thread Skip Montanaro
ChrisA> Your blog breaks the browser's Back button. Please don't do that; if ChrisA> you want people to read your content, make it easy for us to do so. Mark, I didn't even go that far. If you want me to read your blog, please load the individual essays into separate pages, not a narrow scrolling

Re: [Python-ideas] Re: Automatic translation of Python to assembly language

2019-09-08 Thread Chris Angelico
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:12 AM Mark @pysoniq wrote: > > "I don't think the ctypes wrapper in itself is very interesting." > > Well, we disagree on that! I think that automatic generation of a ctypes > wrapper to connect Python to assembly is interesting and a huge timesaver. > > "I don't know wh