On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Nathan Rice
nathan.alexander.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested in fixing both issues. I believe both issues I've had
could be solved by having a robust symbolic object. These objects
would basically usable like ordinary objects, however upon any
attribute
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Devin Jeanpierre
jeanpierr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Nathan Rice
nathan.alexander.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested in fixing both issues. I believe both issues I've had
could be solved by having a robust symbolic object. These
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 1/12/2012 3:45 PM, Nathan Rice wrote:
snip
print isinstance(3, const)
True
A Contraints instance defines a set. 'const' is the set 'odd_ge_3'
It would look better if you used standard syntax and do the inclusion check
I have been writing a lot of code lately that involves creating
symbolic expressions of one form or another, which are then fully
evaluated at a later time. Examples of this include Elementwise,
Python is designed for concrete, rather than symbolic computation. But the
latter has been
