I really like the set notation idea. Now that sets are first class
"citizens" along with dicts, lists and tuples I think they should be
used when it makes sense to use them A keyset of a dictionary should be
viewed as a set not a list because it is a key_set_ after all. Also
sets should get back th
Nick Vatamaniuc wrote:
> I really like the set notation idea. Now that sets are first class
> "citizens" along with dicts, lists and tuples I think they should be
> used when it makes sense to use them
In actual usage, though, how often is it strictly required one uses a
set over a list? It is sim
tic-tacs,
But how often does one use a list or a tuple when a set is actually
more meaningful? -- Probably more than expected, because traditionally
comming from C and in the older Python versions there were no sets.
A prime example are the keys of the dictionary. They are a _set_ not a
list. If
tac-tics wrote:
> Nick Vatamaniuc wrote:
> > I really like the set notation idea. Now that sets are first class
> > "citizens" along with dicts, lists and tuples I think they should be
> > used when it makes sense to use them
>
> In actual usage, though, how often is it strictly required one uses a
