Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
> In message <87hbxkm7n2@benfinney.id.au>, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > For this and other differences introduced in the Python 3.x series, see
> > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3100/>.
>
> People never thank you for an "RTFM" response.
It's a good thing I avoid
In message <87hbxkm7n2@benfinney.id.au>, Ben Finney wrote:
> For this and other differences introduced in the Python 3.x series, see
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3100/>.
People never thank you for an "RTFM" response.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
"earthlink" writes:
> Why does
>
> print "GarbageCollector: collected %d objects." % (gc.collect())
>
> work in 2.4 but not in 3.1?
For this and other differences introduced in the Python 3.x series, see
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3100/>.
--
\ “Please do not feed the animals. I
> Why does
> print "GarbageCollector: collected %d objects." % (gc.collect())
>
> work in 2.4 but not in 3.1?
Because print is a function in 3.1, so you have to follow it with
a parenthesis.
Regards,
Martin
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM, earthlink wrote:
> Why does
> print "GarbageCollector: collected %d objects." % (gc.collect())
>
> work in 2.4 but not in 3.1?
Define "works". What error are you getting? Include the exact message
and full error traceback.
Or if no exception is being raised, explai
Why does
print "GarbageCollector: collected %d objects." % (gc.collect())
work in 2.4 but not in 3.1?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
