Very insightful, thank you for your replies. I was initially thinking it
would be simpler to implement my own system but perhaps using a
ready-made one will be more elegant and potential plugin makers would
find it more familiar.
Cheers,
Greg.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
John J. Lee a écrit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John J. Lee) writes:
>
>> Grzegorz Słodkowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [...]
>>> I'd also be grateful for pointers to a well designed Pythonic plugin
>>> architecture but I'd much prefer a small project with a simple API.
>> Google for setuptools an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John J. Lee) writes:
> Grzegorz Słodkowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
>> I'd also be grateful for pointers to a well designed Pythonic plugin
>> architecture but I'd much prefer a small project with a simple API.
>
> Google for setuptools and Python eggs. Search for "e
Grzegorz Słodkowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> I'd also be grateful for pointers to a well designed Pythonic plugin
> architecture but I'd much prefer a small project with a simple API.
Google for setuptools and Python eggs. Search for "entry point" on
the setuptools page.
John
--
htt
I'm working on my little project (an IM client) which I wanted to
support plugins. My idea was that the core program would by itself do
virtually nothing but manage plugins and all functionality would be
provided by the plugins themselves (including protocol handling and UI.
My first attempt wa
