[slowly catching up...]
In article <9095ae87-c11d-4439-aeed-05533c610...@m24g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>,
Carl Banks wrote:
>
>Distributing the interpreter doesn't look quite as silly as it did
>this morning now, does it?
+1 QOTW, three weeks late
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*>
On Feb 23, 9:13 pm, aha wrote:
> Hello All,
> It occurred to me that I might just want to try copying the
> subprocess.py installed in a /usr/lib/python24 installation to the
> directory where I place the scripts that I need to launch my
> application...I know this was mentioned earlier. Anyway
Hello All,
It occurred to me that I might just want to try copying the
subprocess.py installed in a /usr/lib/python24 installation to the
directory where I place the scripts that I need to launch my
application...I know this was mentioned earlier. Anyway, my
application worked under python 2.3 a
aha wrote:
> I've decided to change the runCmdLine method to Popen.
> [...]
So just exactly why was it necessary to follow this remark with about
three hundred lines of quoted text? And can't you put your replies at
the bottom rather than the top, please? And trim the stuff that isn't
required. It
I've decided to change the runCmdLine method to Popen.
On Feb 23, 4:54 pm, aha wrote:
> Hello All,
> So below is my naive attempt at the wrapper, it is only half baked
> since I am no master at Interprocess communication... I know that it
> is lacking a lot of things comment greatly appreciated:
Hello All,
So below is my naive attempt at the wrapper, it is only half baked
since I am no master at Interprocess communication... I know that it
is lacking a lot of things comment greatly appreciated:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import os, sys, re, exceptions
try:
import subprocess
except Impor
aha wrote
> def runner(cmd, stdin, stdout, ...):
> try:
> import subprocess
> sbm = 1
> except:
> sbm = 0
>
> # Now do something
> if sbm:
> process = subporcess(...)
> else:
> import popen2
> process = popen2.Popen4(...)
>
> Has anyone else run into a situation
bieff...@gmail.com wrote
> I checked, and, for windows platform subprocess.py uses the modules
> mvscrt and _subprocess, which I ham unable to
> locate on my windows XP python 2.6 installation. This make the whole
> thing harder, even impossible if _subprocess has
> been created especially for subp
On Feb 23, 6:06 pm, bieff...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Feb 23, 5:53 pm, aha wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hello All,
> > I am working on a project where I need to support versions of Python
> > as old as 2.3. Previously, we distributed Python with our product, but
> > this seemed a bit silly so we are no lon
On Feb 23, 5:53 pm, aha wrote:
> Hello All,
> I am working on a project where I need to support versions of Python
> as old as 2.3. Previously, we distributed Python with our product, but
> this seemed a bit silly so we are no longer doing this. The problem
> that I am faced with is that we hav
aha wrote:
> Hello All,
> I am working on a project where I need to support versions of Python
> as old as 2.3. Previously, we distributed Python with our product, but
> this seemed a bit silly so we are no longer doing this. The problem
> that I am faced with is that we have Python scripts that
Hello All,
I am working on a project where I need to support versions of Python
as old as 2.3. Previously, we distributed Python with our product, but
this seemed a bit silly so we are no longer doing this. The problem
that I am faced with is that we have Python scripts that use the
subprocess m
12 matches
Mail list logo
