On Sunday, July 29, 2012 10:18:23 PM UTC-7, jwp wrote:
> What's c.l.py's perspective on managing interfaces and implementations?
I pushed another version with support for IID references, so you can refer to
implementations in annotations. The ultimate point of this is to give registry
queries th
On Monday, July 30, 2012 7:09:03 PM UTC-7, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Do *one* and see if github actually does render it. Then do the rest.
Did it for one project. It does render it. =)
Naturally, sphinx autodoc links don't work. =( Come-on github, use dat fundin'
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:41:19 -0700, jwp wrote:
>> BTW I think if you rename the ReStructured Text docs to .rst github
>> will automatically render them.
>
> Did not know that. Gonna go do a lot of git mv's now.
Do *one* and see if github actually does render it. Then do the rest.
--
Steven
--
On Monday, July 30, 2012 6:09:10 PM UTC-7, alex23 wrote:
> a side project, so I may have some more concrete feedback soon :)
=)
> BTW I think if you rename the ReStructured Text docs to .rst github
>
> will automatically render them.
Did not know that. Gonna go do a lot of git mv's now.
Thanks
On Jul 30, 3:18 pm, jwp wrote:
> What's c.l.py's perspective on managing interfaces and implementations?
I've been working with Plone for the past year and have become a big
fan of interfaces. I must admit I _do_ like zope.interface's
adaptation, but your's looks lighter in a way that could be ha
On Sunday, July 29, 2012 10:18:23 PM UTC-7, jwp wrote:
> I just pushed this up to pypi/github, and I hoped to acquire some c.l.py
> opinions.
http://github.com/jwp/py-visage
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi,
I just pushed this up to pypi/github, and I hoped to acquire some c.l.py
opinions.
It's experimental at this point, and might get scrapped.
visage is a loosely coupled interface registry. weakrefs make it cake to
implement.
Basically, zope.interface, but where the interfaces are referenced
