On 8/07/20 12:45 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:28 PM Frank Millman wrote:
Hi all
After iterating over a sequence, the final element is still accessible.
In this case, the variable 'i' still references the integer 4.
Yes, it's guaranteed. It isn't often useful; but the
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:28 PM Frank Millman wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> After iterating over a sequence, the final element is still accessible.
> In this case, the variable 'i' still references the integer 4.
>
Yes, it's guaranteed. It isn't often useful; but the variant where
there's a "break" in th
On 2020-07-07, Frank Millman wrote:
> After iterating over a sequence, the final element is still accessible.
> In this case, the variable 'i' still references the integer 4.
...
> Is this guaranteed in Python, or should it not be relied on?
It is guaranteed, *except* if the sequence is empty an
Hi all
After iterating over a sequence, the final element is still accessible.
In this case, the variable 'i' still references the integer 4.
Python 3.8.2 (tags/v3.8.2:7b3ab59, Feb 25 2020, 23:03:10) [MSC v.1916 64
bit (AMD64)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for mo
