On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:19 AM Axy via Python-list
wrote:
>
> > Did you check the ThreadPoolExecutor or the ProcessPoolExecutor? They
> > won't give you atomic writes unless you add a Lock or a Condition, but
> > they will execute your code in another thread or process.
>
> Yes, I did, but they a
On 2022-09-26, Stefan Ram wrote:
> So, I wanted to try to download all pages in parallel with
> processes to avoid any GIL effect, while I don't understand
> what the GIL actuall is. But processes didn't work here, so
> I tried threads. This worked and now the total run time is
> down to
Did you check the ThreadPoolExecutor or the ProcessPoolExecutor? They
won't give you atomic writes unless you add a Lock or a Condition, but
they will execute your code in another thread or process.
Yes, I did, but they are too complicated to use. I'd like something for
humans, such as
asynch
de Janeiro - Brasil
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 1:01 PM wrote:
> From: Axy
> To: Python List
> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:17:47 +0100
> Subject: Asynchronous execution of synchronous functions
> Hi there,
>
> is there a library to call functions in context of a thread? For
> exam
Hi there,
is there a library to call functions in context of a thread? For
example, as in asyncsqlite which has a thread and a queue I mean has
anyone generalized such an approach already?
If not, I'll do it myself, no problem.
It's a kind of tiny stuff, like atomicwrites, which is quite dif
