Re: C API design flaw (was: Re: Multiple independent Python interpreters in a C/C++ program?)

2008-04-13 Thread Rhamphoryncus
On Apr 12, 2:02 pm, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 12, 7:05 pm, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In theory, a GIL private to each (sub)interpreter would make Python > > more scalable. The current GIL behaves like the BKL in earlier Linux > > kernels. However, some thi

C API design flaw (was: Re: Multiple independent Python interpreters in a C/C++ program?)

2008-04-12 Thread sturlamolden
On Apr 12, 7:05 pm, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In theory, a GIL private to each (sub)interpreter would make Python > more scalable. The current GIL behaves like the BKL in earlier Linux > kernels. However, some third-party software, notably Apache's > mod_python, is claimed to depen