On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Dan Sommers wrote:
> No, they all work the same way (thank goodness!). The "." between "wx"
> and "frame" is the same dot as is between "random" and "choice" (i.e.,
> random.choice is the same construct as wx.frame).
Ah, yes. I totally forgot this.
Thanks for the reminde
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 10:06:25 -0700 (PDT),
Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Dan Sommers wrote:
>> When you import random, all you're doing is importing the module; you
>> have to specify any given attribute thereof:
> I thought that was implied. For example, I use
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Dan Sommers wrote:
> When you import random, all you're doing is importing the module; you have
> to specify any given attribute thereof:
Dan,
I thought that was implied. For example, I use 'import wx' and can then
instantiate wx.frame, wx.dialogbox, etc. without explicit
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 08:29:26 -0700 (PDT),
Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two questions germane to random: 1) Why wasn't choice available when
> I used 'import random,' ...
When you import random, all you're doing is importing the module; you
have to specify any given attribute thereo
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Peter Otten wrote:
> As George hinted, I went a bit over the top with my itertools example.
> Here is a translation into static lists (mostly):
Peter,
Thank you. This is clearer to me. While your original code certainly works
it reminded me of The C Users Journal's annual
Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Peter Otten wrote:
>
>> It's not clear to me why you would use dictionaries, especially as they
>> are unordered; I used lists instead:
>
>...
>
>> Now that is a nice occasion to get acquainted with the itertools
>> module...
>
> Peter,
>
>I
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Peter Otten wrote:
> It's not clear to me why you would use dictionaries, especially as they
> are unordered; I used lists instead:
...
> Now that is a nice occasion to get acquainted with the itertools module...
Peter,
I have to study the docs to understand what's g
Peter Otten wrote:
> from itertools import count, izip, cycle, chain, repeat, starmap, imap
> from random import choice
>
> first = ["X", "Y", "Z"]
> second = ["A", "B", "C"]
> second_count = [13, 14, 33]
> third = [1.1, 2.2, 3.3, 4.4]
>
> random_floats = imap(choice, repeat(third))
> columns = [
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
That doesn't answer the question. A list of 2-tuples would do the same
(and was ordered and could be indexed).
Björn, et al.:
For the purpose of generating a data sample, the list of 2-tuples will
work.
Thanks all,
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepar
Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Peter Otten wrote:
>> It's not clear to me why you would use dictionaries, especially
>> as they are unordered; I used lists instead:
>Because the data comes via a serial port as sequences of two
>bytes from an
> OMR reader, and the byte pairs n
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Peter Otten wrote:
> It's not clear to me why you would use dictionaries, especially as they
> are unordered; I used lists instead:
Peter,
Because the data comes via a serial port as sequences of two bytes from an
OMR reader, and the byte pairs need to be converted into v
Rich Shepard wrote:
>I want to code what would be nested "for" loops in C, but I don't know
>the
> most elegant way of doing the same thing in python. So I need to learn how
> from you folks. Here's what I need to do: build a database table of 180
> rows. Each row contains 31 columns: the
I want to code what would be nested "for" loops in C, but I don't know the
most elegant way of doing the same thing in python. So I need to learn how
from you folks. Here's what I need to do: build a database table of 180
rows. Each row contains 31 columns: the first is an automatically
incremen
13 matches
Mail list logo
