On 12/5/2010 2:49 PM, Martin Manns wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a Python library for 2D collision checks of rotated
rectangles. Currently, I have found vizier 0.5b that is based on pygame.
Since I do not want to add a pygame dependency to my app, I replaced the
pygame.rect.Rect by a wxPython
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 00:53:27 -0800
John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
On 12/5/2010 2:49 PM, Martin Manns wrote:
Probably because you seem to be trying to compute the intersection
point for coincident lines, which is not well-defined.
I found the problem:
pygame returns one pixel more
On 12/7/2010 9:53 AM, John Nagle wrote:
On 12/5/2010 2:49 PM, Martin Manns wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a Python library for 2D collision checks of rotated
rectangles. Currently, I have found vizier 0.5b that is based on pygame.
Since I do not want to add a pygame dependency to my app, I
On Dec 7, 4:11 pm, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
timeit.timeit(fm)
0.58099985122680664
timeit.timeit(fd)
0.5524577636719
Of course it's possible that the random number generation is dominating,
I think that it is. Moving the random number generation out into
setup:
t1 =
Hello,
I am looking for a Python library for 2D collision checks of rotated
rectangles. Currently, I have found vizier 0.5b that is based on pygame.
Since I do not want to add a pygame dependency to my app, I replaced the
pygame.rect.Rect by a wxPython wx.Rect (see code below).
However,
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:49:36 +0100
Martin Manns mma...@gmx.net wrote:
Is my replacement of the rectangle object wrong or is vizier not
working correctly with pygame as well?
Answering my first question:
Vizier works O.K. with pygame.
I am unsure what I did wrong in the rect replacement
