Jorgen Grahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On 8 Jan 2007 23:57:29 -0800, Paddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, whilst colons are not sufficient to re-format a completely
mis-indented file. I'm thinking that they are sufficient for
reformatting most pasted code blocks when refactoring say?
Won't the following rules work when pasting complete Python statements
and complete lines, after other lines in an editor:
lets call the line after which the block is to be pasted the paste
line, and the original indent of the first line of the copied block to
be pasted the copy indent.
OK, whilst colons are not sufficient to re-format a completely
mis-indented file. I'm thinking that they are sufficient for
reformatting most pasted code blocks when refactoring say?
- Paddy.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Paddy wrote:
Thinking about it a little, it seems that a colon followed by
non-indented code that has just been pasted in could also be used by a
Python-aware editor as a flag to re-indent the pasted code.
How would it reindent this code?
if foo:
print Foo!
if bar:
print Bar!
Like this?
if
Paddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If this is not
the case then the user should be asked wether to re-indent the copy
block to be equal to, or de-dented w.r.t. the paste line indent prior
to pasting.
How would the user know this? Every dedent is ambiguous,
On 8 Jan 2007 23:57:29 -0800, Paddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, whilst colons are not sufficient to re-format a completely
mis-indented file. I'm thinking that they are sufficient for
reformatting most pasted code blocks when refactoring say?
Let's put it this way: if the formatter can
On 2007-01-09, Leif K-Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paddy wrote:
Thinking about it a little, it seems that a colon followed by
non-indented code that has just been pasted in could also be
used by a Python-aware editor as a flag to re-indent the
pasted code.
How would it reindent this
i was just perusing a Wikipedia entry on the off side rule at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-side_rule .
It says that the colon in Python is purely for readability, and cites
our FAQ entry
http://www.python.org/doc/faq/general.html#why-are-colons-required-for-the-if-while-def-class-statements
.
I was just perusing a Wikipedia entry on the off side rule at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-side_rule .
It says that the colon in Python is purely for readability, and cites
our FAQ entry
http://www.python.org/doc/faq/general.html#why-are-colons-required-fo...
.
However, near the top of the
Paddy wrote:
I was just perusing a Wikipedia entry on the off side rule at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-side_rule .
It says that the colon in Python is purely for readability, and cites
our FAQ entry
http://www.python.org/doc/faq/general.html#why-are-colons-required-fo...
.
However,
Paddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was just perusing a Wikipedia entry on the off side rule at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-side_rule .
It says that the colon in Python is purely for readability, and cites
our FAQ entry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paddy wrote:
I was just perusing a Wikipedia entry on the off side rule at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-side_rule .
It says that the colon in Python is purely for readability, and cites
our FAQ entry
Paul McGuire wrote:
Paddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was just perusing a Wikipedia entry on the off side rule at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-side_rule .
It says that the colon in Python is purely for readability, and cites
our FAQ entry
13 matches
Mail list logo
