Ben Finney Wrote in message:
> Denis McMahon writes:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Given x,y are a lists of keys and value that I wish to combine to a
>> dictionary, such that x[n] is the key for value y[n], which is preferred:
>>
>> z = {a:b for (a,b) in zip(x,y)}
>
> This one, with the caveat to use PEP-8 c
Denis McMahon writes:
> Hi
>
> Given x,y are a lists of keys and value that I wish to combine to a
> dictionary, such that x[n] is the key for value y[n], which is preferred:
>
> z = {a:b for (a,b) in zip(x,y)}
This one, with the caveat to use PEP-8 compatible formatting::
z = {a: b for (a
In article ,
Denis McMahon wrote:
> Hi
>
> Given x,y are a lists of keys and value that I wish to combine to a
> dictionary, such that x[n] is the key for value y[n], which is preferred:
>
> z = {a:b for (a,b) in zip(x,y)}
> z = {x[n]:y[n] for n in range(min(len(x),len(y)))}
>
> The zip feel
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:43:01 + (UTC)
Denis McMahon wrote:
> Hi
>
> Given x,y are a lists of keys and value that I wish to combine to a
> dictionary, such that x[n] is the key for value y[n], which is preferred:
>
> z = {a:b for (a,b) in zip(x,y)}
> z = {x[n]:y[n] for n in range(min(len(x),
On 11/11/2014 12:43 PM, Denis McMahon wrote:
Hi
Given x,y are a lists of keys and value that I wish to combine to a
dictionary, such that x[n] is the key for value y[n], which is preferred:
z = {a:b for (a,b) in zip(x,y)}
z = {x[n]:y[n] for n in range(min(len(x),len(y)))}
The zip feels more el
Hi
Given x,y are a lists of keys and value that I wish to combine to a
dictionary, such that x[n] is the key for value y[n], which is preferred:
z = {a:b for (a,b) in zip(x,y)}
z = {x[n]:y[n] for n in range(min(len(x),len(y)))}
The zip feels more elegant, but it seems clunky to use the zip meth
