On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, EP wrote:
Roman wrote:
Maybe OP doesn't yet fully comprehend the ways of Python universe?
snip
Don't misinterpret this response. I know it was a rambling. But
*maybe* you
have something to contribute to Python development, even good ideas
only and
no work.
.
Roman Suzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As for concepts, they are from Generic Programming (by Musser and
Stepanov) and I feel that Python is in position to implement them to
the fullest extent. And IMHO it will be nicer than just Java-like
interfaces or Eiffel's contract approach.
I keep
Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is nothing in Wikipedia about [Generic programming].
Oops: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_programming
This helps. But I don't see how it's different from what used to
be called polymorphism.
--
Paul Oops: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_programming
Paul This helps. But I don't see how it's different from what used to
Paul be called polymorphism.
I think of generic programming as polymorphism for statically typed
languages. Using the example from the Wikipedia
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:15:29 +0300, Roman Suzi wrote:
As for concepts, they are from Generic Programming (by Musser and
Stepanov) and I feel that Python is in position to implement them to the
fullest extent. And IMHO it will be nicer than just Java-like interfaces
or Eiffel's contract
