En Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:16:00 -0300, Andrew Durdin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
As for updating ConfigParser -- like most other changes, it probably
needs a champion.
ConfigParser is so dumb that should be burned to death and rebuilt from
the ashes.
--
Gabriel Genellina
--
On 10/19/07, Frank Aune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but as I said I need functionality present in the standard-library, so
sub-classing ConfigParser is the last option really.
Any particular reason you're limited to the standard library?
I've used iniparse http://code.google.com/p/iniparse/
On Friday 19 October 2007 03:42:16 Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
Have you taken a look at ConfigObj?
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/configobj.html
Yes, but as I said I need functionality present in the standard-library, so
sub-classing ConfigParser is the last option really. I was hoping
On Thursday 18 October 2007 15:23, Frank Aune wrote:
Hello,
I use ConfigParser and actually quite like it, EXCEPT that it doesnt
preserve the section order of the original config file when writing a new.
This behaviour is hopeless IMO, and I've been looking for alternatives.
I've been
Hello,
I use ConfigParser and actually quite like it, EXCEPT that it doesnt preserve
the section order of the original config file when writing a new. This
behaviour is hopeless IMO, and I've been looking for alternatives.
I've been reading the interesting discussion on python-dev about
