Thanks for your input, everyone.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 18 juil, 07:54, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:54 am ΤΖΩΤΖΙΟΥ wrote:
>
> > Jumping in:
>
> > What if a construct
>
> > xx(*args1, **kwargs1)yy(*args2, **kwargs2)
>
> > was interpreted as
>
> > xxyy(*(args1+args2), **(kwargs1+kwargs2))
>
> > (Note: with **(kwargs1+kwargs2)
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:54 am ΤΖΩΤΖΙΟΥ wrote:
> Jumping in:
>
> What if a construct
>
>xx(*args1, **kwargs1)yy(*args2, **kwargs2)
>
> was interpreted as
>
> xxyy(*(args1+args2), **(kwargs1+kwargs2))
>
> (Note: with **(kwargs1+kwargs2) I mean “put keyword arguments in the
> order given”,
2011/7/17 ΤΖΩΤΖΙΟΥ :
> Jumping in:
>
> What if a construct
>
> xx(*args1, **kwargs1)yy(*args2, **kwargs2)
>
> was interpreted as
>
> xxyy(*(args1+args2), **(kwargs1+kwargs2))
>
> (Note: with **(kwargs1+kwargs2) I mean "put keyword arguments in the
> order given", since dicts can't be added)
>
>
On 17Jul2011 15:54, ΤΖΩΤΖΙΟΥ wrote:
| What if a construct
|
|xx(*args1, **kwargs1)yy(*args2, **kwargs2)
|
| was interpreted as
|
| xxyy(*(args1+args2), **(kwargs1+kwargs2))
|
| (Note: with **(kwargs1+kwargs2) I mean “put keyword arguments in the
| order given”, since dicts can't be added
On 07/18/2011 12:54 AM, ΤΖΩΤΖΙΟΥ wrote:
> Jumping in:
>
> What if a construct
>
>xx(*args1, **kwargs1)yy(*args2, **kwargs2)
>
> was interpreted as
>
> xxyy(*(args1+args2), **(kwargs1+kwargs2))
>
> (Note: with **(kwargs1+kwargs2) I mean “put keyword arguments in the
> order given”, since
Jumping in:
What if a construct
xx(*args1, **kwargs1)yy(*args2, **kwargs2)
was interpreted as
xxyy(*(args1+args2), **(kwargs1+kwargs2))
(Note: with **(kwargs1+kwargs2) I mean “put keyword arguments in the
order given”, since dicts can't be added)
This construct is currently a syntax erro
