Roopan wrote:
> I assume the C++/Python binding is fairly painless.
http://www.boost.org/libs/python/doc/tutorial/doc/html/index.html
A. :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mar 11, 3:03 am, Bob Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in 337600 20080310 222850 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >On Mar 10, 2:21 pm, Bob Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Java is more portable than most other languages, especially if your app
> >> needs a gui.
>
> >The promise of Java po
in 337600 20080310 222850 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Mar 10, 2:21 pm, Bob Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Java is more portable than most other languages, especially if your app
>> needs a gui.
>
>The promise of Java portability was one of the biggest scams ever
>perpetrated on the sof
On Mar 10, 2:21 pm, Bob Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Java is more portable than most other languages, especially if your app needs
> a gui.
The promise of Java portability was one of the biggest scams ever
perpetrated on the software industry. There are issues going from OS
to OS, VM t
>
> Java is more portable than most other languages, especially if your app needs
> a gui.
Depending on what GUI you want, python is at least as portable - Tkinter
is available for lots of platforms. And swing as a GUI plain sucks -
there is a reason for SWT. But that needs to be installed se
On Mar 9, 7:41 pm, Roopan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am looking at developing an enterprise-grade distributed data
> sharing application - key requirements are productivity and platform
> portability.
>
> Will it be sensible to use C++ for performance-critical sections and
> Python f
Bob Martin wrote:
> Java is more portable than most other languages, especially if your app needs
> a gui.
I don't think anything is more portable for an App GUI than HTML through a
built-in web server.
That said, does gcj compile GUI Apps by now? Or does that not count as
"portable"?
Stefan
-
in 337513 20080310 115744 "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Roopan wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I am looking at developing an enterprise-grade distributed data
>> sharing application - key requirements are productivity and platform
>> portability.
>>
>> Will it be sensible to use C++ for p
Roopan wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am looking at developing an enterprise-grade distributed data
> sharing application - key requirements are productivity and platform
> portability.
>
> Will it be sensible to use C++ for performance-critical sections and
> Python for all the glue logic.
>
> Pls comm
> >> And if you really need the efficiency of "well-tuned raw C", it's one
> >> function
> >> call away in your Cython code.
>
> > What do you mean by that?
>
> > I know nothing about how Cython compares to C in performance, so I said
> > "well-tuned" because it must be possible to write C that is
Matt Nordhoff wrote:
> Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> And if you really need the efficiency of "well-tuned raw C", it's one
>> function
>> call away in your Cython code.
>
> What do you mean by that?
>
> I know nothing about how Cython compares to C in performance, so I said
> "well-tuned" because it m
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> And if you really need the efficiency of "well-tuned raw C", it's one function
> call away in your Cython code.
What do you mean by that?
I know nothing about how Cython compares to C in performance, so I said
"well-tuned" because it must be possible to write C that is fast
Matt Nordhoff wrote:
> For what you do decide to rewrite in C, you can also use a language like
> Cython [1] (which is a fork of Pyrex [2]). It looks mostly like Python,
> and is translated to C without you having to write all of the
> boilerplate Python C API stuff. Of course, not quite as efficie
Paddy wrote:
> After profiling their may be other ways to remove a bottleneck, such
> as
> using existing highly-optimised libraries such as Numpy; Psycho, an
> optimising interpreter that can approach C type speeds for Python
> code;
> and you could create your own C++ based libraries.
>
> You mi
On Mar 9, 11:41 pm, Roopan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am looking at developing an enterprise-grade distributed data
> sharing application - key requirements are productivity and platform
> portability.
>
> Will it be sensible to use C++ for performance-critical sections and
> Python
Hello!
I am looking at developing an enterprise-grade distributed data
sharing application - key requirements are productivity and platform
portability.
Will it be sensible to use C++ for performance-critical sections and
Python for all the glue logic.
Pls comment from your *experiences* how Pyt
16 matches
Mail list logo
