On 12/09/2012, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joshua Landau
> wrote:
>> On 12 September 2012 02:14, Steven D'Aprano
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:52:10 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>>
>>> > Inline functions? I like this idea. I tend to want them in pretty m
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joshua Landau
wrote:
> On 12 September 2012 02:14, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>>
>> And again, Joshua's original post is not available from my provider.
>> Joshua, I suspect that something about your post is being seen as spam
>> and dropped by at least some provid
This is an email address linked to my GMail account. If this works better,
tell me and I'll switch. It's still sending through GMail though.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 12 September 2012 02:14, Steven D'Aprano <
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> And again, Joshua's original post is not available from my provider.
> Joshua, I suspect that something about your post is being seen as spam
> and dropped by at least some providers.
>
I am sorry to ask
On 12 September 2012 01:51, Steven D'Aprano <
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> Sorry for breaking threading, but Joshua's post does not show up on my
> usenet provider.
>
That may explain why I keep getting ignored -.-
I thought it was something I said :P
I'm just using EMail throu
And again, Joshua's original post is not available from my provider.
Joshua, I suspect that something about your post is being seen as spam
and dropped by at least some providers.
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:52:10 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Joshua Landau
> wrot
Sorry for breaking threading, but Joshua's post does not show up on my
usenet provider.
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:22:17 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Joshua Landau
> wrote:
>>
>> If I were to use internal double-underscored names of the form
>> __BS_internalname__
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Joshua Landau
wrote:
> Well, the problem is that a lot of collisions aren't predictable.
> "locals()['foo'] = 2", for example. If it weren't for Python's annoying
> flexibility* I would definitely do something very close to what you suggest.
> Remember that "locals
On 11 September 2012 23:22, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Joshua Landau
> wrote:
> > If I were to use internal double-underscored names of the form
> > __BS_internalname__, would the compiled code be able to assume that
> no-one
> > had overwritten these variables and
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Joshua Landau
wrote:
> If I were to use internal double-underscored names of the form
> __BS_internalname__, would the compiled code be able to assume that no-one
> had overwritten these variables and never will, even through modification
> of, say, locals(). I ask
Were I to make a language to compile to Python, it is highly likely I would
need to use hidden variable names to work constructs that Python alone does
not have. This is the situation I face.
If I were to use internal double-underscored names of the form __BS_*
internalname*__, would the compiled
11 matches
Mail list logo
