On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:31:50 -0600, Chris Mellon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Jan 2007 08:12:41 -0800, sturlamolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Mellon wrote:
This works fine if the binary data is pure asm, but the impresssion
the OP gave is that it's a compiled binary, which you can't
Chris Mellon wrote:
This works fine if the binary data is pure asm, but the impresssion
the OP gave is that it's a compiled binary, which you can't just jump
into this way.
You may have to offset the function pointer so the entry point becomes
correct.
--
On 10 Jan 2007 08:12:41 -0800, sturlamolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Mellon wrote:
This works fine if the binary data is pure asm, but the impresssion
the OP gave is that it's a compiled binary, which you can't just jump
into this way.
You may have to offset the function pointer
Chris Mellon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sigh Repost. Is there any chance at all that ML could set the
reply-to to the list instead of the sender?
+1
- I regularly hit reply all, delete the OP, and then I get :
Message has a suspicious header
- Hendrik
--
On 8 Jan 2007 12:29:36 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to execute a binary string stored within a python script
as executable code ?
The script is run under Windows, and the binary code (a full executable
file) is stored in a
Jorgen Grahn wrote:
On 8 Jan 2007 12:29:36 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For what it's worth[1], under Unix it /is/ impossible. The only way to bring
in
new code (short of dynamic libraries) is to call exec(2) or its variations,
and all need a file system object to load
Jorgen Grahn wrote:
For what it's worth[1], under Unix it /is/ impossible. The only way to bring
in
new code (short of dynamic libraries) is to call exec(2) or its variations,
and all need a file system object to load the code from.
The x86 processor cannot tell the difference between code
On 9 Jan 2007 07:04:11 -0800, sturlamolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorgen Grahn wrote:
For what it's worth[1], under Unix it /is/ impossible. The only way to
bring in
new code (short of dynamic libraries) is to call exec(2) or its variations,
and all need a file system object to load
Is it possible to execute a binary string stored within a python script
as executable code ?
The script is run under Windows, and the binary code (a full executable
file) is stored in a variable in the script.
I know I can use os.system() or os.popen() to run an external file, but
these
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to execute a binary string stored within a python script
as executable code ?
The script is run under Windows, and the binary code (a full executable
file) is stored in a variable in the script.
I know I can use os.system() or os.popen() to run an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to execute a binary string stored within a python script
as executable code ?
The script is run under Windows, and the binary code (a full executable
file) is stored in a variable in the script.
I know I can use os.system() or os.popen() to run an
Larry Bates wrote:
What you are asking is a virus/trojan like program. There's no reason
you shouldn't be able to write the code to TEMP directory and execute it.
-Larry
No, it is not about a trojan, but I guess it's pointless to try to
convince you otherwise.
It's not about being able to
On 8 Jan 2007 12:45:45 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Larry Bates wrote:
What you are asking is a virus/trojan like program. There's no reason
you shouldn't be able to write the code to TEMP directory and execute it.
-Larry
No, it is not about a trojan, but I guess
Chris Mellon wrote:
Writing to a temp file will be at least 3 times as easy and twice as
reliable as any other method you come up with.
I'm not disputing that, but I want to keep a piece of code (a parser
for Oracle binary dumps, that I didn't wrote) out of foreign hands, as
much as possible.
Larry Bates wrote:
What you are asking is a virus/trojan like program.
Why? For being a trojan horse it must fake something. For being a
virus it must replicate itself. Writing an executable doesn't imply
the will to replicate itself.
But you could technically achieve this with standard
Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
But you could technically achieve this with standard python too
(just write python source and spawn a python process executing it).
The code I try to execute is Windows specific and it is binary, not
python. Furthermore, it is stored in a variable within the parent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The code I try to execute is Windows specific and it is binary,
not python. Furthermore, it is stored in a variable within the
parent python script, not stored on harddisk as a file.
Sure, I just wanted to show that your special application is not
specific for trojan
At Monday 8/1/2007 18:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Mellon wrote:
Writing to a temp file will be at least 3 times as easy and twice as
reliable as any other method you come up with.
I'm not disputing that, but I want to keep a piece of code (a parser
for Oracle binary dumps, that I
On 1/8/07, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Monday 8/1/2007 18:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Mellon wrote:
Writing to a temp file will be at least 3 times as easy and twice as
reliable as any other method you come up with.
I'm not disputing that, but I want to keep a
19 matches
Mail list logo
