On Saturday, 22 September 2012 12:50:08 UTC+5:30, Andrew Berg wrote:
> On 2012.09.22 02:08, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
>
> > I find this intriguing, I had no idea bots existed to post to mailing
>
> > lists in this way. What's the point of them?
>
>
>
> To amuse their owners is my guess.
>
>
On 2012.09.22 02:08, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> I find this intriguing, I had no idea bots existed to post to mailing
> lists in this way. What's the point of them?
To amuse their owners is my guess.
--
CPython 3.3.0rc2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17835
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyth
[ Ian Kelly wrote on Sat 22.Sep'12 at 0:22:43 -0600 ]
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:49:55 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:54 PM, 8 Dihedral
> >> wrote:
> >>> I don't think functional aspects are only marked
Ian於 2012年9月22日星期六UTC+8下午2時23分43秒寫道：
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Steven D'Aprano
>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:49:55 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:54 PM, 8 Dihedral
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> I don't think functional aspects are only marked a
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:49:55 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:54 PM, 8 Dihedral
>> wrote:
>>> I don't think functional aspects are only marked as lazy programming.
>>
>> He wrote "lazy evaluation", not "lazy progr
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:49:55 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:54 PM, 8 Dihedral
> wrote:
>> I don't think functional aspects are only marked as lazy programming.
>
> He wrote "lazy evaluation", not "lazy programming". Two entirely
> different things.
For the record, the
A
Ian於 2012年9月22日星期六UTC+8上午4時50分49秒寫道：
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:54 PM, 8 Dihedral
>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't think functional aspects are only marked as lazy
>
> > programming.
>
>
>
> He wrote "lazy evaluation", not "lazy programming". Two entirely
>
> different things.
>
>
>
> >
On 21 September 2012 21:49, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:54 PM, 8 Dihedral
> wrote:
> > I don't think functional aspects are only marked as lazy
> > programming.
>
> He wrote "lazy evaluation", not "lazy programming". Two entirely
> different things.
>
> > It just means when
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:54 PM, 8 Dihedral
wrote:
> I don't think functional aspects are only marked as lazy
> programming.
He wrote "lazy evaluation", not "lazy programming". Two entirely
different things.
> It just means when one is experimenting something
> the efficient execution in sp
Ulrich Eckhardt於 2012年9月21日星期五UTC+8下午5時15分03秒寫道：
> Am 21.09.2012 00:58, schrieb thorso...@lavabit.com:
>
> > list = [{'1': []}, {'2': []}, {'3': ['4', '5']}]
>
> >
>
> > I want to check for a value (e.g. '4'), and get the key of the dictionary
>
> > that contains that value.
>
>
>
> Note:
>
Am 21.09.2012 00:58, schrieb thorso...@lavabit.com:
list = [{'1': []}, {'2': []}, {'3': ['4', '5']}]
I want to check for a value (e.g. '4'), and get the key of the dictionary
that contains that value.
Note:
1. list is a built-in type, who's name is rebound above
2. The list above contains dict
On 21.09.2012 00:58, thorso...@lavabit.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> list = [{'1': []}, {'2': []}, {'3': ['4', '5']}]
>
> I want to check for a value (e.g. '4'), and get the key of the dictionary
> that contains that value.
> (Yep, this is bizarre.)
>
> some_magic(list, '4')
> => '3'
>
> What's the func
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:58 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> list = [{'1': []}, {'2': []}, {'3': ['4', '5']}]
Are the dictionaries each guaranteed to only contain a single
key-value pair? (Or is your example just simplistic?)
> I want to check for a value (e.g. '4'), and get the key of the dictionary
> th
On 21.09.2012 00:58, thorso...@lavabit.com wrote:
Hi,
list = [{'1': []}, {'2': []}, {'3': ['4', '5']}]
I want to check for a value (e.g. '4'), and get the key of the dictionary
that contains that value.
(Yep, this is bizarre.)
some_magic(list, '4')
=> '3'
What's the functional way to do it?
I
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:58 AM, wrote:
>
>> That gets the result, but probably not in the cleanest way. I'm not
>> sure off-hand if Python has a convenient way to curry a function,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:58 AM, wrote:
> That gets the result, but probably not in the cleanest way. I'm not
> sure off-hand if Python has a convenient way to curry a function,
http://docs.python.org/library/functools.html#functools.par
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:58 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> list = [{'1': []}, {'2': []}, {'3': ['4', '5']}]
>
> I want to check for a value (e.g. '4'), and get the key of the dictionary
> that contains that value.
> (Yep, this is bizarre.)
>
> some_magic(list, '4')
> => '3'
>
> What's the functional way t
Hi,
list = [{'1': []}, {'2': []}, {'3': ['4', '5']}]
I want to check for a value (e.g. '4'), and get the key of the dictionary
that contains that value.
(Yep, this is bizarre.)
some_magic(list, '4')
=> '3'
What's the functional way to do it?
Is it possible to do it with a one-liner?
--
h
18 matches
Mail list logo
