On Oct 12, 2:01 am, Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's reasonable speed, but is that just to do the set intersections
and return the size of the result set, or does it retrieve the actual
result set? It only showed 20 results on a page. I notice that
|
|
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/09/20/conventional_hard_drive_obsole...
Unclipped link is
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/09/20/conventional_hard_drive_obsoletism/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.xfeedme.com/nucular/gut.py/go?FREETEXT=w
(w for web) we get 6294 entries which takes about 500ms on
a cold index and about 150ms on a warm index. This is on a very
active shared hosting machine.
That's reasonable speed, but is that just to do the set
On Oct 11, 3:30 am, Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Delaney, Timothy (Tim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As for [ http://nucular.sourceforge.net ]
itself, I've only had a chance to glance at the
site...
Thanks for taking a look. I hope you don't mind if I disagree
with a number of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...but it looks a little more akin to Solr than to Lucene. ...
I'm not sure but I think nucular has aspects of both since
it implements both the search engine itself and also provides
XML and HTTP interfaces
That sounds reasonable.
As a test I built an index
regarding http://nucular.sourceforge.net
On Oct 11, 12:32 pm, Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many items did each query return? When I refer to large result
sets, I mean you often get queries that return 10k items or more (a
pretty small number: typing python into google gets
Delaney, Timothy (Tim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the case of nucular, it's a mispronunciation that has been widely
ridiculed all over the world. There are people (including myself) who so
associate it as an object of ridicule that it's an immediate turn-off.
It gave me a chuckle, since it's
On 2007-10-09, Bill Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/9/07, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-10-09, Robin Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 9, 8:46 am, Istvan Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ps. there is a python project named The Devil
From: Grant Edwards
Anyway, I apologize for my attempt at humor, since it appears
to have somehow offended.
Why apologize? If someone doesn't like the name given to a piece of
software by its author(s), screw them. If I find the software useful,
I'll use it. Even if its called
On Oct 10, 11:08 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why apologize? If someone doesn't like the name given to a piece of
software by its author(s), screw them. If I find the software useful,
I'll use it. Even if its called 'bouncingBetty'.
Or 'BeautifulSoup' for that matter ;-)
George
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Grant Edwards
Anyway, I apologize for my attempt at humor, since it appears
to have somehow offended.
Why apologize? If someone doesn't like the name given to a piece of
software by its author(s), screw them. If I find the software useful,
I'll use it.
On 10/9/07, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-10-09, Robin Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 9, 8:46 am, Istvan Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ps. there is a python project named The Devil Framework, I cringe
every time I hear about it.Nucularis
12 matches
Mail list logo
