On 27Mar2010 19:44, Stephen Hansen wrote:
| Yeah, I don't expect much from PNG. The images are very small but I
| might be sending a LOT of them over a pipe which is fairly tight, so
| 50-60 bytes matters. That's why I selected GIF.
How well does a stream of XPM files compress? Probably not enoug
En Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:41:23 -0300, Gregory Ewing
escribió:
Stephen Hansen wrote:
So I wonder if there's just some hyper-optimization Photoshop does that
PIL can't round-trip.
You may find that PIL isn't bothering to compress at all,
or only doing it in a very simpleminded way.
Indeed.
F
Stephen Hansen wrote:
So I wonder if there's just some hyper-optimization Photoshop does that
PIL can't round-trip.
You may find that PIL isn't bothering to compress at all,
or only doing it in a very simpleminded way.
--
Greg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Harishankar wrote:
>
>> Just opening, and then saving the same file with no changes at all,
>> resulted in a 72 byte file growing to 920.
>>
>> I thought it was GIF87a vs GIF89a... but have since come to determine it
>> doesn't appear to be. I decided to give PNG a try again, since those
>> extr
since the images only use a couple colors each, just run length encode it.
Depending on the image, you may be able to get a super small size that way,
and avoid the whole mess.
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Harishankar wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:44:54 -0700, Stephen Hansen wrote:
>
> > O
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:44:54 -0700, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On 2010-03-27 08:17:46 -0700, Alain Ketterlin said:
>
>> Stephen Hansen writes:
>
>>> If not, are there any decent other image libraries out there that
>>> anyone's familiar with? The only one I could find was PythonMagick,
>>> which s
On 2010-03-27 08:17:46 -0700, Alain Ketterlin said:
Stephen Hansen writes:
If not, are there any decent other image libraries out there
that anyone's familiar with? The only one I could find was
PythonMagick, which seems completely undocumented. Or I'm blind.
I don't know PythonMagick, but
Stephen Hansen writes:
> Is it possible to get PIL to save GIF's in GIF89A format, instead of
> GIF87A?
GIF89 was patented. I guess that is why it isn't used by PIL. (The
patent has expired now, IIRC.) Anyway, PNG was supposed to replace GIF.
> If not, are there any decent other image libraries
On 2010-03-26 21:37:10 -0700, Lawrence D'Oliveiro said:
In message <2010032618455468300-aptshan...@gmailinvalid>, Stephen Hansen
wrote:
Is it possible to get PIL to save GIF's in GIF89A format, instead of
GIF87A?
Why? What does GIF do for you that PNG doesn’t?
If I take this PSD and save i
In message <2010032618455468300-aptshan...@gmailinvalid>, Stephen Hansen
wrote:
> Is it possible to get PIL to save GIF's in GIF89A format, instead of
> GIF87A?
Why? What does GIF do for you that PNG doesn’t?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi, all.
Is it possible to get PIL to save GIF's in GIF89A format, instead of
GIF87A? If not, are there any decent other image libraries out there
that anyone's familiar with? The only one I could find was
PythonMagick, which seems completely undocumented. Or I'm blind.
Ahem.
But the proble
11 matches
Mail list logo