@ChrisA
You, my friend, certainly put the nail in the coffin!
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 5, 2015, at 5:52 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com:
You can chain 'for' and 'if' clauses
Hi,
I recently found interesting GOTCHA while doing list comprehension in python
2.6:
values = ( True, False, 1, 2, 3, None )
[ value for value in values if value if not None ]
[True, 1, 2, 3]
I was wondering why this list comprehension returns incorrect results and
finally found a typo
(a):
Hi,
I recently found interesting GOTCHA while doing list comprehension in python
2.6:
values = ( True, False, 1, 2, 3, None )
[ value for value in values if value if not None ]
[True, 1, 2, 3]
I was wondering why this list comprehension returns incorrect results and
finally found
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Pavel S pa...@schon.cz wrote:
Hi,
I recently found interesting GOTCHA while doing list comprehension in python
2.6:
values = ( True, False, 1, 2, 3, None )
[ value for value in values if value if not None ]
[True, 1, 2, 3]
I was wondering why this list
Pavel S wrote:
Hi,
I recently found interesting GOTCHA while doing list comprehension in
python 2.6:
values = ( True, False, 1, 2, 3, None )
[ value for value in values if value if not None ]
[True, 1, 2, 3]
I was wondering why this list comprehension returns incorrect results
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago)
$ python --version
Python 2.6.6
Incidentally, why Python 2.6?
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Pavel S pa...@schon.cz wrote:
It seems this is allowed by the grammar:
list_display::= [ [expression_list | list_comprehension] ]
list_comprehension ::= expression list_for
list_for::= for target_list in old_expression_list
[list_iter]
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Pavel S pa...@schon.cz wrote:
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago)
$ python --version
Python 2.6.6
Incidentally, why Python 2.6?
I guess that would be why :)
That's probably actually a patched 2.6.6 - from what I
Hi Chris, yeah, I have to stick on the software which my employer provides to
me (we're enterprise company). I'm not root on that system. I'm happy with 2.6
now, two years ago we were on older RHEL with python 2.4 and it was a real pain
:)
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com:
You can chain 'for' and 'if' clauses as much as you like, and they
behave exactly the way you'd expect.
How do you know what I'd expect?
I wouldn't know what to expect myself.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com:
You can chain 'for' and 'if' clauses as much as you like, and they
behave exactly the way you'd expect.
How do you know what I'd expect?
I wouldn't know what to expect myself.
A list
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com:
You can chain 'for' and 'if' clauses as much as you like, and they
behave exactly the way you'd expect.
How do you know what I'd expect?
I wouldn't
In a message of Wed, 05 Aug 2015 17:05:49 +1000, Chris Angelico writes:
Incidentally, why Python 2.6? Python 2.7 has been out for a pretty
long time now, and if you can't move to version 3.x, I would at least
recommend using 2.7. Since the release of 2.6.9 back before Frozen
came out, that branch
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Laura Creighton l...@openend.se wrote:
In a message of Wed, 05 Aug 2015 17:05:49 +1000, Chris Angelico writes:
Incidentally, why Python 2.6? Python 2.7 has been out for a pretty
long time now, and if you can't move to version 3.x, I would at least
recommend using
14 matches
Mail list logo
