In message , Geoff
Gardiner wrote:
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> .. I expect an apology.
>> Otherwise, it becomes grounds for an abuse complaint to your ISP.
>>
> Yes, I do apologize profusely and publicly ...
Thank you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> .. I expect an apology.
> Otherwise, it becomes grounds for an abuse complaint to your ISP.
>
Yes, I do apologize profusely and publicly, and would have done so
regardless of threat.
I had trouble with posts making it through to the list and so was also
posting in
In message , Geoff
Gardiner wrote:
> @Lawrence D'Oliveiro:
> ...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming
this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I expect an apology.
Othe
Aahz wrote:
> ... That seems to demonstrate that regrtest.py is indeed a good mechanism for
> finding out whether it's a b0rked install!
>
I agree that regrtest.py looks a good mechanism. It just appears that
`apt-get install python` on Debian and Ubuntu brings no tests with it.
@Lawrence D'Ol
In article ,
Geoff Gardiner wrote:
>Aahz wrote:
>>
>> What directory are you running this from? What happens if you switch to
>> running "python Lib/test/regrtest.py"? Taking a closer look, this looks
>> more like a plain import error.
>
>I couldn't do quite that because there's no Lib, but in
In message , Geoff
Gardiner wrote:
> How do I assure myself of the integrity of a Python installation
> acquired using apt-get install on Debian and Ubuntu?
apt-get install debsums
man debsums
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Aahz wrote:
>
> What directory are you running this from? What happens if you switch to
> running "python Lib/test/regrtest.py"? Taking a closer look, this looks
> more like a plain import error.
>
Thank you for your suggestion.
I couldn't do quite that because there's no Lib, but inste
In article ,
Geoff Gardiner wrote:
>
>geg...@gegard:~$ python
>Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:28:52)
>[GCC 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)] on linux2
>Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
from test import regrtest
regrtest.main()
>test_grammar
Aahz wrote:
> How important is the apt-get requirement?
That's a significant point, thank you. Two parts to the response:
a) I don't feel that I am sufficiently expert to launch into compilation
of Python if I can avoid it.
b) I hope that I can put all platform risk into the lap of the hosting
In article ,
Geoff Gardiner wrote:
>
>How do I assure myself of the integrity of a Python installation
>acquired using apt-get install on Debian and Ubuntu?
How important is the apt-get requirement? Building Python yourself in
this situation sounds like it would be simpler/safer.
--
Aahz (a...
How do I assure myself of the integrity of a Python installation
acquired using apt-get install on Debian and Ubuntu?
I can run regrtest but there's nothing in the basic installation to run,
viz.:
geg...@gegard:~$ python
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:28:52)
[GCC 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2u
11 matches
Mail list logo
