In article d95cc38a-70bf-44d5-b5d2-f9248c16c...@15g2000prz.googlegroups.com,
alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Phillip M. Feldman pfeld...@verizon.net wrote:
It does seem as though IPython could be a bit more clever about this. =A0
I disagree. I _like_ that IPython is only reporting on the
En Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:51:30 -0300, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com escribió:
Phillip M. Feldman pfeld...@verizon.net wrote:
It does seem as though IPython could be a bit more clever about this.
I disagree. I _like_ that IPython is only reporting on the current
state of the interpreter and not
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 23:04:42 -0800 (PST) Dr. Phillip M. Feldman
pfeld...@verizon.net wrote:
If I create a module xyz.py with a docstring xyz does everything
you could possibly want. at the top, the command ?xyz issued at
the IPython prompt does not display this docstring. What am I doing
On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 10:55:50 +0100, Andreas Waldenburger wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 23:04:42 -0800 (PST) Dr. Phillip M. Feldman
pfeld...@verizon.net wrote:
If I create a module xyz.py with a docstring xyz does everything you
could possibly want. at the top, the command ?xyz issued at the
* He hasn't actually defined a docstring. Docstrings have to be string
literals, you can't do this:
%s does everything you could possibly want. % xyz
I've occasionally wanted something like this, and have found that
it can be done by manually assigning to __doc__ (either at the
module-level
On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 06:34:17 -0600, Tim Chase wrote:
* He hasn't actually defined a docstring. Docstrings have to be string
literals, you can't do this:
%s does everything you could possibly want. % xyz
I've occasionally wanted something like this, and have found that it can
be done by
On Dec 6, 7:43 am, Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-
cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 06:34:17 -0600, Tim Chase wrote:
I've occasionally wanted something like this, and have found that it can
be done by manually assigning to __doc__ (either at the module-level or
classes)
Steven D'Aprano-7 wrote:
On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 10:55:50 +0100, Andreas Waldenburger wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 23:04:42 -0800 (PST) Dr. Phillip M. Feldman
pfeld...@verizon.net wrote:
If I create a module xyz.py with a docstring xyz does everything you
could possibly want. at the top,
OK. I was able to reproduce the problem. My difficulty was that the command
that I issued initially was from xyz import * rather than just import
xyz. If I say import xyz, then the docstring is defined; if I say from
xyz import *, it isn't. I'm not sure whether this is a bug or expected
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman
pfeld...@verizon.net wrote:
OK. I was able to reproduce the problem. My difficulty was that the command
that I issued initially was from xyz import * rather than just import
xyz. If I say import xyz, then the docstring is defined; if I
Dr. Phillip M. Feldman, 06.12.2009 21:34:
OK. I was able to reproduce the problem. My difficulty was that the command
that I issued initially was from xyz import * rather than just import
xyz. If I say import xyz, then the docstring is defined; if I say from
xyz import *, it isn't. I'm not
Chris Rebert wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman
pfeld...@verizon.net wrote:
OK. I was able to reproduce the problem. My difficulty was that the command
that I issued initially was from xyz import * rather than just import
xyz. If I say import xyz, then the
Phillip M. Feldman pfeld...@verizon.net wrote:
It does seem as though IPython could be a bit more clever about this.
I disagree. I _like_ that IPython is only reporting on the current
state of the interpreter and not trying to second guess what I meant.
If the user asks for documentation on
If I create a module xyz.py with a docstring xyz does everything you could
possibly want. at the top, the command ?xyz issued at the IPython prompt
does not display this docstring. What am I doing wrong?
--
View this message in context:
14 matches
Mail list logo
