On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:19:12 +, kj wrote:
> I like Python a lot, and in fact I'm doing most of my scripting in
> Python these days, but one thing that I absolutely *DETEST*
> about Python is that it does allow an internal function to modify
> variables in the enclosing local scope.
Yo
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:19:12 +, kj wrote:
> I like Python a lot, and in fact I'm doing most of my scripting in
> Python these days, but one thing that I absolutely *DETEST*
> about Python is that it does allow an internal function to modify
> variables in the enclosing local scope.
Yo
kj wrote:
I like Python a lot, and in fact I'm doing most of my scripting in
Python these days, but one thing that I absolutely *DETEST*
about Python is that it does allow an internal function to modify
variables in the enclosing local scope. This willful hobbling of
internal functions
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, kj wrote:
> I like Python a lot, and in fact I'm doing most of my scripting in
> Python these days, but one thing that I absolutely *DETEST*
> about Python is that it does allow an internal function to modify
> variables in the enclosing local scope. This
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, kj wrote:
> I like Python a lot, and in fact I'm doing most of my scripting in
> Python these days, but one thing that I absolutely *DETEST*
> about Python is that it does allow an internal function to modify
> variables in the enclosing local scope. This
I like Python a lot, and in fact I'm doing most of my scripting in
Python these days, but one thing that I absolutely *DETEST*
about Python is that it does allow an internal function to modify
variables in the enclosing local scope. This willful hobbling of
internal functions seems to m
