On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:15:10 PM UTC+2, Ian wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
>
> wrote:
>
> > I was thinking about something like that but the issue is that this really
> > only works when you don't do any actual blocking work. I may be able to get
> > a
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> I was thinking about something like that but the issue is that this really
> only works when you don't do any actual blocking work. I may be able to get
> around the sleep() but then I have to fetch the URL or do some other work
>
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:46:34 PM UTC+2, Ian wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm trying to implement a system for periodically checking URLs and I've
> > run into problems with some of the implementation details. The URLs are
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to implement a system for periodically checking URLs and I've run
> into problems with some of the implementation details. The URLs are supposed
> to be checked continuously until the config for an URL is explicitl
Hi,
I'm trying to implement a system for periodically checking URLs and I've run
into problems with some of the implementation details. The URLs are supposed to
be checked continuously until the config for an URL is explicitly removed.
The plan is to spawn a worker process for each URL that send
