> Yes, Digital Mars D is what I was referring to and yes I know D is not
> as efficient as C++. If I knew of a good C++ compiler that is not
> from Microsoft that works natively with Windows I would be happy to
> consider using it.
I've had good luck with MinGW (gcc compiled for windows).
http:/
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:00:27 -0700, Python Maniac wrote:
> On Sep 21, 11:39 pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:25:20 -0700, Python Maniac wrote:
>>
>> > Well D code is compiled into machine code that runs via a VM.
>>
>> About which D are we talking h
On Sep 21, 12:56 am, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It has to do with the input string length; try multiplying it by 10 or
> > 100. Below is a more complete benchmark; for largish strings, the imap
> > version is the fastest among those using
On Sep 21, 11:39 pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:25:20 -0700, Python Maniac wrote:
> > On Sep 21, 3:02 pm, "Matt McCredie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Isn't D compiled to machine code? I would expect it to win hands down.
> >> That is, unless i
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:25:20 -0700, Python Maniac wrote:
> On Sep 21, 3:02 pm, "Matt McCredie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Isn't D compiled to machine code? I would expect it to win hands down.
>> That is, unless it is horribly unoptimized.
>>
>>
> Well D code is compiled into machine code tha
On Sep 21, 4:48 pm, "Matt McCredie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would be nice if Python could be made to automatically detect the
> > LC and string translation patterns used by the unoptimized Python code
> > and make them into optimized Python code on the fly at runtime. I am
> > more than
> It would be nice if Python could be made to automatically detect the
> LC and string translation patterns used by the unoptimized Python code
> and make them into optimized Python code on the fly at runtime. I am
> more than a little amazed nobody has chosen to build a JIT (Just In-
> Time compi
On Sep 21, 3:02 pm, "Matt McCredie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now I think I will code this little scrambler using nothing but the D
> > Language just to see whether there is any benefit in using D over
> > Python for this sort of problem.
>
> Isn't D compiled to machine code? I would expect it
> Now I think I will code this little scrambler using nothing but the D
> Language just to see whether there is any benefit in using D over
> Python for this sort of problem.
Isn't D compiled to machine code? I would expect it to win hands down.
That is, unless it is horribly unoptimized.
Matt
--
On Sep 21, 1:00 pm, Python Maniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My best runtime with Ruby using the same machine and OS was 67.797
> secs which is 29.8x slower than the fastest Python runtime. This
> makes Ruby almost as slow as Python was made faster. The irony with
> Ruby was that the use of a
On Sep 21, 12:56 am, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It has to do with the input string length; try multiplying it by 10 or
> > 100. Below is a more complete benchmark; for largish strings, the imap
> > version is the fastest among those using
George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has to do with the input string length; try multiplying it by 10 or
> 100. Below is a more complete benchmark; for largish strings, the imap
> version is the fastest among those using the original algorithm. Of
> course using a lookup table as Diez sho
On Sep 20, 7:13 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 20, 5:46 pm, Paul Hankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 20, 10:59 pm, Python Maniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
> > > know more about
On Sep 20, 7:13 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How come it's not? Then I noticed you don't have brackets in
> the join statement. So I tried without them and got
If memory serves me right newer versions of python will recognize and
optimize string concatenation via the += op
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sep 20, 5:46 pm, Paul Hankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sep 20, 10:59 pm, Python Maniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
>>> know more about Python than I do at this time.
>>> def scrambleLine(
Python Maniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
> know more about Python than I do at this time.
Use the array module and do 32-bit or 64-bit operations with it.
See http://nightsong.com/phr/crypto/p3.py for a more serious
encryption
On Sep 20, 5:46 pm, Paul Hankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 20, 10:59 pm, Python Maniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
> > know more about Python than I do at this time.
>
> > def scrambleLine(line):
> > s = ''
> >
On Sep 20, 3:57 pm, "Matt McCredie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Python Maniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
> > know more about Python than I do at this time.
>
> Well, you could save some time by not applying the
Python Maniac wrote:
> I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
> know more about Python than I do at this time.
>
> def scrambleLine(line):
> s = ''
> for c in line:
> s += chr(ord(c) | 0x80)
> return s
>
> def descrambleLine(line):
> s = ''
>
On 21/09/2007, Tim Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/09/2007, Python Maniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
> > know more about Python than I do at this time.
> >
> > def scrambleLine(line):
> >s = ''
> >for c in
On 20/09/2007, Python Maniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
> know more about Python than I do at this time.
>
> def scrambleLine(line):
>s = ''
>for c in line:
>s += chr(ord(c) | 0x80)
>return s
>
> def descramb
On 9/20/07, Python Maniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
> know more about Python than I do at this time.
Well, you could save some time by not applying the scramble one line
at a time (that is if you don't mind losing the line end
Python Maniac schrieb:
> I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
> know more about Python than I do at this time.
>
> def scrambleLine(line):
> s = ''
> for c in line:
> s += chr(ord(c) | 0x80)
> return s
>
> def descrambleLine(line):
> s = ''
On Sep 20, 10:59 pm, Python Maniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
> know more about Python than I do at this time.
>
> def scrambleLine(line):
> s = ''
> for c in line:
> s += chr(ord(c) | 0x80)
> return s
>
> de
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at this time.
def scrambleLine(line):
s = ''
for c in line:
s += chr(ord(c) | 0x80)
return s
def descrambleLine(line):
s = ''
for c in line:
s += chr(ord(c) &
25 matches
Mail list logo
