On Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 4:19:59 AM UTC-7, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't like the object orientated part of Python.
>
> The idea/prospect of having to write "self" everywhere... seems very
> horrorific and a huge time waster.
>
> (Perhaps the module thing of python might help
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 4:49:59 PM UTC+5:30, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't like the object orientated part of Python.
>
> The idea/prospect of having to write "self" everywhere... seems very
> horrorific and a huge time waster.
>
> (Perhaps the module thing of python might he
On 11/06/15 14:16, MRAB wrote:
harder then they anticipated.
---^
seems nicer... then having to use self everywhere...
"then"? Should be "than"... (That seems to be happening more and more
these days...)
Indeed :-)
--
Ce n'est pas parce qu'ils sont nombreux à avoir tort qu'ils ont
On 06/11/2015 05:19 AM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> I haven't written much OO code yet in Python... and don't plan on doing it
> too...
Except that you already have written OO code in Python with your parser.
Or at least code that interacts heavily with OO. Anytime you call a
method on a string lik
On 2015-06-11 12:27, Skybuck Flying wrote:
Then again...
I also believe the highest goal for a programming language is "natural
spoken" language.
Natural language is full of ambiguities.
If "self.somefield" equals 10 then...
Does have some understandable ring to it.
However... time constra
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> If I wanted to access a global variable I would use the existing "global"
> thing
>
> global SomeField...
>
> maybe if I wanted to use a local variable for routine:
>
> local SomeField...
>
> seems nicer... then having to use self everywhere
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> If I wanted to access a global variable I would use the existing "global"
> thing
>
> global SomeField...
>
> maybe if I wanted to use a local variable for routine:
>
> local SomeField...
>
> seems nicer... then having to use self everywhere
Then again...
I also believe the highest goal for a programming language is "natural
spoken" language.
If "self.somefield" equals 10 then...
Does have some understandable ring to it.
However... time constraints also have to be kept in mind.
In another words if the code looks like
begin of
Another typo corrected... see (*)
"Skybuck Flying" wrote in message
news:2c87e$55796f2c$5419aafe$47...@news.ziggo.nl...
Little typo corrected... it's a common typo I seem to make.
"with" had to be "without" see ***.
"Skybuck Flying" wrote in message news:...
Hello,
I don't like the o
Little typo corrected... it's a common typo I seem to make.
"with" had to be "without" see ***.
"Skybuck Flying" wrote in message news:...
Hello,
I don't like the object orientated part of Python.
The idea/prospect of having to write "self" everywhere... seems very
horrorific and a huge time
Hello,
I don't like the object orientated part of Python.
The idea/prospect of having to write "self" everywhere... seems very
horrorific and a huge time waster.
(Perhaps the module thing of python might help in future not sure about
that).
What are your thoughts on the "self" thing/requir
11 matches
Mail list logo