Re: IDLE is not as interactive as Maple

2009-08-20 Thread laser
Thanks very much for your information. Reinteract looks like exactly what I want. It give me the similary feeling of using Maple. I like this kind of programming style. People who did not have this experience really should take a try. On 8月20日, 下午9时11分, André wrote: > On Aug 20, 12:22 am, laser

Re: IDLE is not as interactive as Maple

2009-08-20 Thread sturlamolden
On 19 Aug, 20:22, laser wrote: > In the future, will Python provide programe enviroment like Maple > does? You might be looking for SAGE. http://www.sagemath.org/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: IDLE is not as interactive as Maple

2009-08-20 Thread Benjamin Kaplan
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:22 PM, laser wrote: > In the future, will Python provide programe enviroment like Maple > does? In Maple, you can remove anything unneeded in the editor. And > the code execution order are not necessary in one direction. You can > run any command line on the screen by > p

Re: IDLE is not as interactive as Maple

2009-08-20 Thread André
On Aug 20, 12:22 am, laser wrote: > In the future, will Python provide programe enviroment like Maple > does? A quick, flip answer: perhaps if you design one? Tools for Python are designed by people scratching an itch. That being said, have a look at reinteract: http://www.reinteract.org/trac/w

IDLE is not as interactive as Maple

2009-08-19 Thread laser
In the future, will Python provide programe enviroment like Maple does? In Maple, you can remove anything unneeded in the editor. And the code execution order are not necessary in one direction. You can run any command line on the screen by push Enter key. These functions gave a lot of flaxibility