Re: Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-06 Thread Carl Banks
On Mar 5, 8:11 pm, D'Arcy J.M. Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:36:29 +1100 Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Those of us who identify the time wasters would also like to drop the responses to their posts and changing the address makes this impossible. Not at

Re: Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-06 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:58:06 -0800 (PST) Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't want to have to tag every thread. I just want to *plonk* certain posters. Anyway, I'll live with Google's failings I guess. Sounds like you need better filtering. A decent news filter should be able

Re: Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-06 Thread castironpi
On Mar 6, 10:47 am, D'Arcy J.M. Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:58:06 -0800 (PST) Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't want to have to tag every thread.  I just want to *plonk* certain posters. Anyway, I'll live with Google's failings I guess. Sounds like

Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-05 Thread Ben Finney
D'Arcy J.M. Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:38:59 -0800 (PST) Mike Driscoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 5, 12:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure why you change the address like this but could you please include the full address. It's a misfeature of

Re: Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-05 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:36:29 +1100 Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Those of us who identify the time wasters would also like to drop the responses to their posts and changing the address makes this impossible. Not at all. AFAIK the messages from Google mail correctly include the