On Mar 5, 8:11 pm, D'Arcy J.M. Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:36:29 +1100
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those of us who identify the time wasters would also like to drop
the responses to their posts and changing the address makes this
impossible.
Not at
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:58:06 -0800 (PST)
Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to have to tag every thread. I just want to *plonk*
certain posters.
Anyway, I'll live with Google's failings I guess.
Sounds like you need better filtering.
A decent news filter should be able
On Mar 6, 10:47 am, D'Arcy J.M. Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:58:06 -0800 (PST)
Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to have to tag every thread. I just want to *plonk*
certain posters.
Anyway, I'll live with Google's failings I guess.
Sounds like
D'Arcy J.M. Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:38:59 -0800 (PST)
Mike Driscoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 5, 12:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure why you change the address like this but could you
please include the full address.
It's a misfeature of
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:36:29 +1100
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those of us who identify the time wasters would also like to drop
the responses to their posts and changing the address makes this
impossible.
Not at all. AFAIK the messages from Google mail correctly include the