Re: Image handling - stupid question

2008-04-16 Thread Gary Herron
Jumping Arne wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:21:13 +0200, Jumping Arne wrote > (in article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>): > > >> I'm going to try to write some imange manipulation code (scaling, reading >> EXIF and IPTC info) and just want to ask if PIL is *THE* library to use? >> >> I looked at

Re: Image handling - stupid question

2008-04-16 Thread Jumping Arne
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:21:13 +0200, Jumping Arne wrote (in article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>): > I'm going to try to write some imange manipulation code (scaling, reading > EXIF and IPTC info) and just want to ask if PIL is *THE* library to use? > > I looked at

Re: Image handling - stupid question

2008-04-16 Thread Berco Beute
On Apr 16, 12:21 pm, Jumping Arne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm going to try to write some imange manipulation code (scaling, reading > EXIF and IPTC info) and just want to ask if PIL is *THE* library to use? Depends on your requirements, but it's certainly the first library I would check out.

Re: Image handling - stupid question

2008-04-16 Thread Bruno Desthuilliers
Jumping Arne a écrit : > I'm going to try to write some imange manipulation code (scaling, reading > EXIF and IPTC info) and just want to ask if PIL is *THE* library to use? > > I looked at and noticed that the > latest version is from Dec 2006. > > In

Re: Image handling - stupid question

2008-04-16 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
Jumping Arne wrote: > I'm going to try to write some imange manipulation code (scaling, reading > EXIF and IPTC info) and just want to ask if PIL is *THE* library to use? > > I looked at and noticed that the > latest version is from Dec 2006. > > In my e

Image handling - stupid question

2008-04-16 Thread Jumping Arne
I'm going to try to write some imange manipulation code (scaling, reading EXIF and IPTC info) and just want to ask if PIL is *THE* library to use? I looked at and noticed that the latest version is from Dec 2006. In my experience that means that either