Re: import question

On 20/11/2021 03.38, lucas wrote: > ok. all good advice. thank you for that. and with all that I've decided > what to do. > > I'm going to close off any server-side python access so that I don't expose > my server or the file system to vulnerabilities and/or wonton attacks. I am > building

Re: import question

ok. all good advice. thank you for that. and with all that I've decided what to do. I'm going to close off any server-side python access so that I don't expose my server or the file system to vulnerabilities and/or wonton attacks. I am building a site for education and what I will configure

Re: import question

On 11/18/21 21:00, Dan Stromberg wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 6:19 PM Chris Angelico wrote: On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:24 AM Dan Stromberg wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:21 PM Chris Angelico wrote: If you're trying to make a Python-in-Python sandbox, I recommend not. Instead, use

Re: import question

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 3:00 PM Dan Stromberg wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 6:19 PM Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:24 AM Dan Stromberg wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:21 PM Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> >> >> If you're trying to make a Python-in-Pyt

Re: import question

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 6:19 PM Chris Angelico wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:24 AM Dan Stromberg > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:21 PM Chris Angelico > wrote: > >> > >> If you're trying to make a Python-in-Python sandbox, I recommend not. > >> Instead, use an OS-level sand

Re: import question

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:24 AM Dan Stromberg wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:21 PM Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> If you're trying to make a Python-in-Python sandbox, I recommend not. >> Instead, use an OS-level sandbox (a chroot, probably some sort of CPU >> usage limiting, etc), and use

Re: import question

On 2021-11-17, lucas wrote: > are there any other ways to import a module or package other then > the "import" or "from...import..." statements? i ask because i'm > allowing programming on my web2py website and i don't want any > accessing packages like os or sys. Safely allowing people to ente

Re: import question

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:21 PM Chris Angelico wrote: > If you're trying to make a Python-in-Python sandbox, I recommend not. > Instead, use an OS-level sandbox (a chroot, probably some sort of CPU > usage limiting, etc), and use that to guard the entire Python process. > Python-in-Python will b

Re: import question

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 7:09 AM lucas wrote: > > hello one and all, > > are there any other ways to import a module or package other then the > "import" or "from...import..." statements? i ask because i'm allowing > programming on my web2py website and i don't want any accessing packages like

import question

hello one and all, are there any other ways to import a module or package other then the "import" or "from...import..." statements? i ask because i'm allowing programming on my web2py website and i don't want any accessing packages like os or sys. thank you in advance and have a great day, luc

Re: Module import question

On Aug 9, 2020 11:41 AM, "Mats Wichmann" wrote: > > On 8/9/20 12:51 AM, Gabor Urban wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I have a quite simple question but I could not find the correct answer. > > > > I have twoo modules A and B. A imports B. If I import A in a script, Will > > be B imported automatically?

Re: Module import question

Hi guys, Thanks for the answers. IT is clear Noé. Gábor -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Module import question

On 8/9/20 12:51 AM, Gabor Urban wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have a quite simple question but I could not find the correct answer. > > I have twoo modules A and B. A imports B. If I import A in a script, Will > be B imported automatically? I guess not, but fő not know exactly. > > Thanks for your ans

Re: Module import question

Gabor Urban writes: > Hi guys, > > I have a quite simple question but I could not find the correct answer. > > I have twoo modules A and B. A imports B. If I import A in a script, Will > be B imported automatically? I guess not, but fő not know exactly. > > Thanks for your answer ín advance, #+B

Module import question

Hi guys, I have a quite simple question but I could not find the correct answer. I have twoo modules A and B. A imports B. If I import A in a script, Will be B imported automatically? I guess not, but fő not know exactly. Thanks for your answer ín advance, Gábor -- https://mail.python.org/mail

Re: trivial import question

On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 9:52:33 AM UTC-8, nevets...@gmail.com wrote: > The underscore relative to a prfixed abbb. Is to be noted Reviving a fourteen year-old thread? That has to be some kind of record. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

trivial import question

The underscore relative to a prfixed abbb. Is to be noted -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Import Question

On 02/20/2013 03:53 PM, eli m wrote: How long does it take for the program to import something? I am asking this because i have like 7 imports at the beginning of my program and i am thinking thats the reason why it is slow to start up. Thanks in advance. That would be easy to measure. If y

Re: Import Question

you can check each import as it varies in loading time: time python -c "import [name of module]" example: time python -c "import flask" On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:53 PM, eli m wrote: > How long does it take for the program to import something? I am asking > this because i have like 7 imports at

Re: Import Question

Il 20/02/2013 21:53, eli m ha scritto: How long does it take for the program to import something? I am asking this because i have like 7 imports at the beginning of my program and i am thinking thats the reason why it is slow to start up. Thanks in advance. It depend of your code module code..

Import Question

How long does it take for the program to import something? I am asking this because i have like 7 imports at the beginning of my program and i am thinking thats the reason why it is slow to start up. Thanks in advance. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Import question

Those are called namespace packages. Zope and Plone (ab)use them > extensively. The intended usage is to break up a big, monolithic package > [0] in parts that can be distributed independently. To implement a > namespace package, you need an empty __init__.py file with only these > lines [1]: > >

Re: Import question

En Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:37:53 -0300, Andrew Degtiariov escribió: 2010/2/6 Gabriel Genellina En Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:21:47 -0300, Andrew Degtiariov escribió: Code of our project has split into several packages and we deploy the project using buildout. All worked fine until I need to dynamical

Re: Import question

2010/2/6 Gabriel Genellina > En Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:21:47 -0300, Andrew Degtiariov > escribió: > > > Code of our project has split into several packages and we deploy the >> project using buildout. >> All worked fine until I need to dynamically inspect python modules. >> > > Entirely by luck, I

Re: Import question

En Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:21:47 -0300, Andrew Degtiariov escribió: Code of our project has split into several packages and we deploy the project using buildout. All worked fine until I need to dynamically inspect python modules. Entirely by luck, I'd say :) ├───project.api.config │ ├───proje

Import question

Code of our project has split into several packages and we deploy the project using buildout. All worked fine until I need to dynamically inspect python modules. Here is structure of our src directory ├───project.api.config │ ├───project │ │ └───api │ │ └───config │ │ └

Re: A package import question

En Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:38:24 -0300, Dan Yamins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: >> Gabriel, thanks. I understood about the fact that import only loads the > first time, but didn't realize that "del" only removes the bound reference > to the object, not as I had hoped the thing from the namespace its

Re: Another (perhaps similar) import question

>> >> > > Please keep responses to python-list discussion on python-list, not my > personal mail box. -- Thanks. > Sorry. When I hit "reply" on gmail to your message, your personal email comes up as opposed to the python list address. My apologies for not looking for closely. > I'd suggest u

Re: A package import question

You have removed the "archive" attribute from the object to which the > "Operations" name is referring to. > >>>> import Operations.archive >> > > Python keeps a reference to all imported modules in sys.modules; if a > module was already imported, any subsequent imports of the same module just

Re: Another (perhaps similar) import question

Dan Yamins wrote: What is the principle behind this? And, is there some simple way (other than restarting the interpreter) of "reloading" that wipes out the old attributes associated with a given name so that spurious attributes do not remain? No. Con

Re: A package import question

En Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:01:56 -0300, Dan Yamins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: I'm having a problem importing a package in python, deleting some of what's been imported, and then reimporting. (I'm the sure the problem is trivial, but I just don't understand it.) I have a directory of pytho

Re: Another (perhaps similar) import question

Dan Yamins wrote: I also have noticed another (to me) strange thing about module imports. If anyone could explain this to me, that would be great (I apologize if it's too elementary for this list.) Suppose I have a module #file: testmodule.py a = 1 When importing this module, obviously

Another (perhaps similar) import question

I also have noticed another (to me) strange thing about module imports. If anyone could explain this to me, that would be great (I apologize if it's too elementary for this list.) Suppose I have a module #file: testmodule.py a = 1 When importing this module, obviously 'a' becomes an attrib

A package import question

I'm having a problem importing a package in python, deleting some of what's been imported, and then reimporting. (I'm the sure the problem is trivial, but I just don't understand it.) I have a directory of python modules called Operations. It contains a python module called archive.py.Here's

Re: Simple import question about mac osx

On Apr 29, 3:47 pm, "Jerry Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When you run your code in pythonwin, it's just like calling 'python -i > chap2.py'  It runs the code in chap2.py, then gives you an interpreter > window to interact with your code.  In this case, that means that > FooClass is visible wit

Re: Simple import question about mac osx

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:17 PM, jmDesktop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Windows I took the text file I created on mac with vi and opened it > in PythonWin. I ran it. It compiled. I run the import and call from > the python interpreter. You're not doing what you think you're doing. I'm no

Re: Simple import question about mac osx

On Apr 29, 2:17 pm, jmDesktop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 29, 2:37 pm, "Jerry Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:14 PM, jmDesktop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks. That worked on mac. But it does work like I said in > > > Windows. Don't know why

Re: Simple import question about mac osx

On Apr 29, 2:37 pm, "Jerry Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:14 PM, jmDesktop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >  Thanks.  That worked on mac.  But it does work like I said in > >  Windows.  Don't know why.  Mr. Chun must also be using Windows because > >  that is the way he

Re: Simple import question about mac osx

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:14 PM, jmDesktop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks. That worked on mac. But it does work like I said in > Windows. Don't know why. Mr. Chun must also be using Windows because > that is the way he does it in his book. It shouldn't work that way on windows either.

Re: Simple import question about mac osx

On Apr 29, 1:54 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Apr 29, 12:46 pm, jmDesktop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 29, 1:16 pm, jmDesktop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, I have this code (learning from Core Python, Chun's book), module > > > named chap2.py. > > > > class FooClass(

Re: Simple import question about mac osx

On Apr 29, 12:46 pm, jmDesktop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 29, 1:16 pm, jmDesktop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, I have this code (learning from Core Python, Chun's book), module > > named chap2.py. > > > class FooClass(object): > > version=0.1 > > > def __init__(s

Re: Simple import question about mac osx

On Apr 29, 1:16 pm, jmDesktop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, I have this code (learning from Core Python, Chun's book), module > named chap2.py. > > class FooClass(object): >         version=0.1 > >         def __init__(self, nm='John Doe'): >                 self.name=nm >                 print

Simple import question about mac osx

Hi, I have this code (learning from Core Python, Chun's book), module named chap2.py. class FooClass(object): version=0.1 def __init__(self, nm='John Doe'): self.name=nm print 'Created a class instance for ', nm def showname(self):

Re: Library package import question

En Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:34:26 -0300, Frank Aune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > I have a python library package 'Foo', which contains alot of submodules: > > Foo/: > __init__.py > module1.py: > class Bar() > class Hmm() > module2.py > cl

Re: Library package import question

2007/11/5, Frank Aune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > To prevent namespace pollution, I want to import and use this library in the > following way: > > import Foo > (...) > t = Foo.module2.Bee() from x import y as z that has always worked for me to prevent pollution... -- http://noneisyours.marcher.na

Library package import question

Hello, I have a python library package 'Foo', which contains alot of submodules: Foo/: __init__.py module1.py: class Bar() class Hmm() module2.py class Bee() class Wax() module3.py etc

Re: package import question

On Oct 22, 1:24 pm, Peter Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Phoe6 wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have the following directory structure: > > > wallpaper/ > > -main.py > > -ng/ > > -- __init__.py > > -- setdesktop.py > > -yb/ > >

Re: package import question

Phoe6 wrote: > Hi all, > I have the following directory structure: > > wallpaper/ > -main.py > -ng/ > -- __init__.py > -- setdesktop.py > -yb/ > -- __init__.py > -- setdesktop.py > >>Fro

Re: package import question

Phoe6 wrote: > Hi all, > I have the following directory structure: > > wallpaper/ > -main.py > -ng/ > -- __init__.py > -- setdesktop.py > -yb/ > -- __init__.py > -- setdesktop.py > >>Fro

package import question

Hi all, I have the following directory structure: wallpaper/ -main.py -ng/ -- __init__.py -- setdesktop.py -yb/ -- __init__.py -- setdesktop.py >From main.py, I would like to do: import n

Re: Import question

Lamonte Harris wrote: > On 8/22/07, *Wildemar Wildenburger* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > So your'e basically saying that you haven't tried it? > > No I haven't. Thats why I asked? Common sense? Sorry. Excuse my sarcasm. The common way for answering easy questi

Re: Import question

Lamonte Harris wrote: > can I import more then one modules like this: > > import module,module2 So your'e basically saying that you haven't tried it? /W -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Import question

can I import more then one modules like this: import module,module2 ? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

relative import question: packaging scripts

What is the recommended packaging of demo scripts or test scripts for a package that has modules that use relative imports? Example: Suppose I have the package structure: package/ __init__.py subpackage1/ __init__.py moduleY.py subpackage2/ __init__.py

Re: Organizing code - import question

On 5/3/07, Brian Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Carlos Hanson wrote: > > It looks like you need __init__.py in MyPackage. Then you can import > > starting with MyPackage. For example, you might use one of the > > following: > > > > import MyPackage > > from MyPackage.Common import * > >

Re: Organizing code - import question

En Thu, 03 May 2007 12:41:00 -0300, Brian Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > I am trying to organize some of my code, and am having a little trouble > with the import logic. I find I often have something like: > > MyPackage/ > Part1/ # wants to use functions in Common/ > __init__

Re: Organizing code - import question

Carlos Hanson wrote: > It looks like you need __init__.py in MyPackage. Then you can import > starting with MyPackage. For example, you might use one of the > following: > > import MyPackage > from MyPackage.Common import * > etc > that means that MyPackage must be in the sys path too?

Re: Organizing code - import question

On May 3, 8:41 am, Brian Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to organize some of my code, and am having a little trouble with > the > import logic. I find I often have something like: > > MyPackage/ > Part1/ # wants to use functions in Common/ > __init__.py # does

Organizing code - import question

Hello, I am trying to organize some of my code, and am having a little trouble with the import logic. I find I often have something like: MyPackage/ Part1/ # wants to use functions in Common/ __init__.py # does "from MyClass1 import MyClass1", etc,... MyClass1.py MyClass

Re: import question on wx ?

wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in comp.lang.python: > > I think what you say makes perfect sense > > I am using 2.4.2 python (I typed pthon -V on console to get) > > How can I find what my SPE editor is using ? > Wherever you can run python you can find the version by running the following

Re: import question on wx ?

That right..on my console it shows python 2.4.2 and on SPE it shows 2.4.3. The wxPython is working fine in SPE i.e with Python 2.4.3. How can I make sure that when I type python on console I get the 2.4.3 ? Every help is greatly appreciated. Thanks John Salerno wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: import question on wx ?

John Salerno wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have installed wx and everything looks fine. I have written a small > > app that uses wx. > > > > When I run my program from the console like > > ubuntu $ python PROGRAM_NAME.py > > > > it gives error > > Traceback (most recent call last): > >

Re: import question on wx ?

I think what you say makes perfect sense I am using 2.4.2 python (I typed pthon -V on console to get) How can I find what my SPE editor is using ? John Salerno wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have installed wx and everything looks fine. I have written a small > > app that uses wx. > >

Re: import question on wx ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have installed wx and everything looks fine. I have written a small > app that uses wx. > > When I run my program from the console like > ubuntu $ python PROGRAM_NAME.py > > it gives error > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "Project.py", line 6, in ? >

import question on wx ?

I have installed wx and everything looks fine. I have written a small app that uses wx. When I run my program from the console like ubuntu $ python PROGRAM_NAME.py it gives error Traceback (most recent call last): File "Project.py", line 6, in ? import wx ImportError: No module named wx B

Re: noob import question

PA wrote: > On May 19, 2006, at 15:33, Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > > > And it seems as if you have some JAVA-background, putting one class in > > one > > file called the same as the class. Don't do that, it's a stupid > > restriction > > in JAVA and should be avoided in PYTHON. > > Restrictive or not

Re: noob import question

[Please don't top-post. Please don't indiscriminately quote the entire message you respond to. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_posting>] Brian Blazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thank you for your responses. I had a feeling is had something to > do with a namespace issue but I wasn't sure. A

Re: noob import question

PA wrote: > > On May 19, 2006, at 15:33, Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > >> And it seems as if you have some JAVA-background, putting one class in >> one >> file called the same as the class. Don't do that, it's a stupid >> restriction >> in JAVA and should be avoided in PYTHON. > > Restrictive or no

Re: [OT] noob import question

Brian Blazer wrote: please, dont top-post, and edit out irrelevant material > You are right, I do come from a Java background. Then you may want to read this: http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/python-is-not-java.html HTH -- bruno desthuilliers python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w

Re: noob import question

Brian Blazer wrote: > OK, I have a very simple class here: > > class Student: class Student(object): > """Defines the student class""" > > def __init__(self, lName, fName, mi): > self.lName = lName > self.fName = fName > self.mi = mi Do yourself a favour: use me

Re: noob import question

"PA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Restrictive or not, what's so fundamentally devious in putting a class > declaration in a separate file whose name is that of the declared class > (class Queue -> Queue.py)? nothing. > Sounds like a handy way of organizing your code, no? sure, if you prefer to

Re: noob import question

On May 19, 2006, at 15:33, Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > And it seems as if you have some JAVA-background, putting one class in > one > file called the same as the class. Don't do that, it's a stupid > restriction > in JAVA and should be avoided in PYTHON. Restrictive or not, what's so fundamental

Re: noob import question

Brian Blazer wrote: > Thank you for your responses. I had a feeling is had something to do > with a namespace issue but I wasn't sure. > > You are right, I do come from a Java background. If it is poor form > to name your class file the same as your class, can I ask what the > standard is? Con

Re: noob import question

Thank you for your responses. I had a feeling is had something to do with a namespace issue but I wasn't sure. You are right, I do come from a Java background. If it is poor form to name your class file the same as your class, can I ask what the standard is? Thanks again, Brian On May 19

Re: noob import question

> I have tried to look up what is going on, but I have not found > anything. Would it be possible for someone to take a minute and give > an explanation? The from import <*|nameslist> syntax imports some or all names found in into the current modules namespace. Thus you can access your class.

Re: noob import question

Brian Blazer wrote: > OK, I have a very simple class here: > > class Student: > """Defines the student class""" > > def __init__(self, lName, fName, mi): > self.lName = lName > self.fName = fName > self.mi = mi > > Then I have a small script that I am using as

noob import question

OK, I have a very simple class here: class Student: """Defines the student class""" def __init__(self, lName, fName, mi): self.lName = lName self.fName = fName self.mi = mi Then I have a small script that I am using as a test: from Student import * s1 = Stu

Re: Silly import question (__file__ attribute)

On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:25:20 -0500, Jack Diederich wrote: > It is a built-in module so it doesn't have a .so (dll) or .py file > to mention. Wouldn't it make sense for module.__file__ to be set to None rather than completely missing in this case? -- Steven. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/

Re: Silly import question (__file__ attribute)

"mh" wrote: > So on most modules I import, I can access the .__file__ attribute to > find the implementation. ie: > >>> import time > >>> time.__file__ > '/data1/virtualpython/lib/python2.3/lib-dynload/timemodule.so' > >>> import socket > >>> socket.__file__ > '/data1/virtualpython/lib/python2.3/

Re: Silly import question (__file__ attribute)

On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 02:04:45PM -0800, mh wrote: > So on most modules I import, I can access the .__file__ attribute to > find the implementation. ie: > >>> import time > >>> time.__file__ > '/data1/virtualpython/lib/python2.3/lib-dynload/timemodule.so' > >>> import socket > >>> socket.__file__

Silly import question (__file__ attribute)

So on most modules I import, I can access the .__file__ attribute to find the implementation. ie: >>> import time >>> time.__file__ '/data1/virtualpython/lib/python2.3/lib-dynload/timemodule.so' >>> import socket >>> socket.__file__ '/data1/virtualpython/lib/python2.3/socket.pyc' This doesn't wor

Re: Tricky import question.

repr() is a new one on me I am afraid, and I have yet to achieve any decent competance with global and local lists. As you probaly noticed earlier, I managed to bungle my way through this time. However, I will log this thread away for when I next get stuck with a bindings. Thank you Bengt :-)

Re: Tricky import question.

All I was trying to do with my feeble code attempt, was to return a reference to the imported module so that I could do... result = instanceref.main() where main was a function within the import. Having glanced at the code in the import section of the help files all morning, when I actually sat

Re: Tricky import question.

On 25 Oct 2005 08:51:08 -0700, "David Poundall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >This worked ... > >def my_import(name): >mod = __import__(name) >components = name.split('.') >for comp in components[1:]: >mod = getattr(mod, comp) >return mod > >for reasons given here... > >http:

Re: Tricky import question.

On 25 Oct 2005 06:39:15 -0700, "David Poundall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >importedfiles = {} >for f in FileList > f2 = f.split('.')[0] # strip the .py, .pyc importedfiles[f2] = __import__(f2).main # it sounds like all you want is the above (untested ;-), or # use __import__(f2).m

Re: Tricky import question.

This worked ... def my_import(name): mod = __import__(name) components = name.split('.') for comp in components[1:]: mod = getattr(mod, comp) return mod for reasons given here... http://www.python.org/doc/2.3.5/lib/built-in-funcs.html -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/l

Re: Tricky import question.

Sadly I get this reply when I try that. AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'main' I am getting the impression that the value returned from the __import__() function is only a string reference NOT an object. I am going to have a go at trying this with the imp' module as that specifi

Re: Tricky import question.

David Poundall wrote: > importedfiles = {} > for f in FileList > f2 = f.split('.')[0] # strip the .py, .pyc > __import__(f2) > s2 = f2+'.main()' # main is the top file in each import > c = compile(s2, '', 'eval') > importedfiles[f2] = eval(c) > > 'importedfiles' should hold an

Tricky import question.

importedfiles = {} for f in FileList f2 = f.split('.')[0] # strip the .py, .pyc __import__(f2) s2 = f2+'.main()' # main is the top file in each import c = compile(s2, '', 'eval') importedfiles[f2] = eval(c) 'importedfiles' should hold an object reference to the main() fun

Re: Import question

Crap. Forgot to mention that in some instances, I do want the class definitions to create new instances and such. Sorry :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Import question

I've got multiple instances I want globally available in the secondary modules, which can't easily be passed around with every function call without driving me nuts, so I wish to have all variables from the Main module passed to each of the other modules it creates. One such example would be in Ma

Re: Import question

ncf wrote: > Hmm...thanks for the replies. Judging by this, it looks like I might > still be in a slight perdiciment with doing it all, but time will tell. > I wish there were a way I could reference across multiple modules. > > Well, thanks for your help. Hopefully I'll be able to work out some >

Re: Import question

Hmm...thanks for the replies. Judging by this, it looks like I might still be in a slight perdiciment with doing it all, but time will tell. I wish there were a way I could reference across multiple modules. Well, thanks for your help. Hopefully I'll be able to work out some *simple* solution for

Re: Import question

ncf wrote: > In file A, I have an instance of a class and then I import file B > (import fileB as fb). In file B, I need to access file A's class > instance. Is there anyway I can do this? (I hope that was descriptive > enough :\) Let's see... # -- fileA.py class Test(object): pass myInstance =

Re: Import question

Circular import issues can usually be resolved by moving import statements into the bodies of functions which aren't executed when the module itself is imported. Simple example: fileA.py -- import fileB as fb foo = 10# we're going to access foo from fileB fb.do_something_with_foo()

Import question

In file A, I have an instance of a class and then I import file B (import fileB as fb). In file B, I need to access file A's class instance. Is there anyway I can do this? (I hope that was descriptive enough :\) -Wes -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

module/import question

I'm trying to import Logilab's constraint module like this: from logilab.constraint import * from within a Python interactive session. The module is not installed correctly on our system, and it won't be, so i adjusted my PYTHONPATH, added an empty __init__.py file, then started up an interac

Re: Newbie: module structure and import question

> yes i know it's related to search path, but i don't know how to set it in a > practical way (beside hard coding). > my concern is, if i want to create a custom module/library, i don't know > what py file will import it and where the working directory should be. Regarding where the current workin

Re: Newbie: module structure and import question

Thx Rob. yes i know it's related to search path, but i don't know how to set it in a practical way (beside hard coding). my concern is, if i want to create a custom module/library, i don't know what py file will import it and where the working directory should be. sometime like my example, even i

Re: Newbie: module structure and import question

> hi all, > i have question on how to design a module structure. > for example, i have 3 files. > [somewhere]/main.py > [somewhere]/myLib/Base/BaseA.py > [somewhere]/myLib/ClassA.py > > . > It's fine when i run main.py. > however when i run ClassA.py individually, it would fail in import >

  1   2   >