Mark Wooding, 19.11.2010 02:35:
John Nagle writes:
This has been pointed out many times by many people. There's
even a PhD thesis on the topic. Without a few restrictions, so
that a compiler can at least tell when support for the hard cases
is needed, Python cannot be compiled well.
Th
On 11/18/2010 5:35 PM, Mark Wooding wrote:
John Nagle writes:
Python is defined by what a naive interpreter with late binding
and dynamic name lookups, like CPython, can easily implement. Simply
emulating the semantics of CPython with generated code doesn't help
all that much.
Indeed.
On Nov 18, 2:59 pm, Jean-Paul Calderone
wrote:
> On Nov 18, 1:31 pm, John Nagle wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 11/18/2010 4:24 AM, BartC wrote:
>
> > > "John Nagle" wrote in message
> > >news:4ce37e01$0$1666$742ec...@news.sonic.net...
> > >> On 11/16/2010 10:24 PM, swapnil wrote:
>
> > >>> AFAIK, the m
John Nagle writes:
> Python is defined by what a naive interpreter with late binding
> and dynamic name lookups, like CPython, can easily implement. Simply
> emulating the semantics of CPython with generated code doesn't help
> all that much.
Indeed.
> Because you can "monkey patch"
On Nov 18, 1:31 pm, John Nagle wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 4:24 AM, BartC wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "John Nagle" wrote in message
> >news:4ce37e01$0$1666$742ec...@news.sonic.net...
> >> On 11/16/2010 10:24 PM, swapnil wrote:
>
> >>> AFAIK, the merging plan was approved by Guido early this year. I
>
On 18/11/2010 17:50, brf...@gmail.com wrote:
I do hope that it isn't dead but it unfortunately seems that way?
- Braden Faulkner
It looks like we'll have to get used to a laden one.
Maybe if we had two, and a strand of creeper...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/18/2010 4:24 AM, BartC wrote:
"John Nagle" wrote in message
news:4ce37e01$0$1666$742ec...@news.sonic.net...
On 11/16/2010 10:24 PM, swapnil wrote:
AFAIK, the merging plan was approved by Guido early this year. I
guess Google is expecting the community to drive the project
from here on.
I do hope that it isn't dead but it unfortunately seems that way?
- Braden Faulkner
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 4:24 AM, BartC wrote:
> "John Nagle" wrote in message
> news:4ce37e01$0$1666$742ec...@news.sonic.net...
>
> On 11/16/2010 10:24 PM, swapnil wrote:
>>
>
> AFAIK, the merging plan was approved by Guido early this year. I guess
>>> Google is expecting the community to driv
"John Nagle" wrote in message
news:4ce37e01$0$1666$742ec...@news.sonic.net...
On 11/16/2010 10:24 PM, swapnil wrote:
AFAIK, the merging plan was approved by Guido early this year. I guess
Google is expecting the community to drive the project from here on.
That was the whole idea for merging
On Nov 17, 2010, at 5:09 PM, John Nagle wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 12:49 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
>> On Nov 16, 2:30 pm, laspi wrote:
>>> Is Unladen Swallow dead?
>>
>> No, it's just resting.
>
> For those who don't get that, The Monty Python referenc
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:51:01 +0100, Alexander Kapps wrote:
> On 17.11.2010 23:09, John Nagle wrote:
>> On 11/17/2010 12:49 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
>>> On Nov 16, 2:30 pm, laspi wrote:
>>>> Is Unladen Swallow dead?
>>>
>>> No, it's just resting.
On 11/17/10 4:51 PM, Alexander Kapps wrote:
On 17.11.2010 23:09, John Nagle wrote:
On 11/17/2010 12:49 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
On Nov 16, 2:30 pm, laspi wrote:
Is Unladen Swallow dead?
No, it's just resting.
For those who don't get that, The Monty Python refere
On 17.11.2010 23:09, John Nagle wrote:
On 11/17/2010 12:49 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
On Nov 16, 2:30 pm, laspi wrote:
Is Unladen Swallow dead?
No, it's just resting.
For those who don't get that, The Monty Python reference:
"http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~ebarnes/python/dead-parro
On 11/17/2010 12:49 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
On Nov 16, 2:30 pm, laspi wrote:
Is Unladen Swallow dead?
No, it's just resting.
For those who don't get that, The Monty Python reference:
"http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~ebarnes/python/dead-parrot.htm";
Owner: Oh yes, the, uh
On Nov 16, 2:30 pm, laspi wrote:
>Is Unladen Swallow dead?
No, it's just resting.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/16/2010 10:24 PM, swapnil wrote:
On Nov 17, 3:30 am, laspi wrote:
There has been little or no activity at all in this project in the
last months, and the last comments on their mailing list seem to
conrfim that it's future is uncertain.
It's also very strange the lack of updates, news or
On Nov 17, 3:30 am, laspi wrote:
> There has been little or no activity at all in this project in the
> last months, and the last comments on their mailing list seem to
> conrfim that it's future is uncertain.
> It's also very strange the lack of updates, news or discussions,
> specially consideri
I'm not a contributor to the U-S project, but I have been monitoring
alternative python implementations' progress some, and seem to be adding
something to pypy all of a sudden.
I think unladen swallow has produced performance improvements, and they are
likely to be merged into cpython 3.3.
Howeve
There has been little or no activity at all in this project in the
last months, and the last comments on their mailing list seem to
conrfim that it's future is uncertain.
It's also very strange the lack of updates, news or discussions,
specially considering that the merging plan has been approved.
20 matches
Mail list logo
