In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 2 May 2007 09:41:56 -0700, rh0dium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On May 2, 8:25 am, Gary Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > rh0dium wrote:
.
.
.
>T
On Wed, 02 May 2007 07:22:07 -0700, rh0dium wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Below is a basic threading program. The basic I idea is that I have a
> function which needs to be run using a queue of data. Early on I
> specified my function needed to only accept basic parameters ( no
> postional *args or *kwar
On 2 May 2007 09:41:56 -0700, rh0dium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 2, 8:25 am, Gary Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > rh0dium wrote:
> > >> This is far more work than you need. Push an (args, kwargs) tuple into
> > >> your arguments queue and call self.function(*args, **kwargs).
> >
> >
On May 2, 8:25 am, Gary Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rh0dium wrote:
> >> This is far more work than you need. Push an (args, kwargs) tuple into
> >> your arguments queue and call self.function(*args, **kwargs).
>
> > No see I tried that and that won't work.
>
> Won't work? How does it fail?
On May 2, 7:49 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Yes - using inspect.getargspec. I don't have example code at hand yet,
> but it's not really complicated.
Viola!! Hey this works!! Now I have modified my code to do this - way
cool (still kind of a mess though)
args, varargs, varkw, d
On 2 May 2007 08:13:12 -0700, rh0dium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is far more work than you need. Push an (args, kwargs) tuple into
> > your arguments queue and call self.function(*args, **kwargs).
>
> No see I tried that and that won't work.
>
> I'm assuming what you are referring to is th
rh0dium wrote:
>> This is far more work than you need. Push an (args, kwargs) tuple into
>> your arguments queue and call self.function(*args, **kwargs).
>>
>
> No see I tried that and that won't work.
>
Won't work? How does it fail?
> I'm assuming what you are referring to is this (effect
> This is far more work than you need. Push an (args, kwargs) tuple into
> your arguments queue and call self.function(*args, **kwargs).
No see I tried that and that won't work.
I'm assuming what you are referring to is this (effectively)
Q.put(((),{a:"foo", b:"bar}))
input = Q.get()
self.funct
On 2 May 2007 07:22:07 -0700, rh0dium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Below is a basic threading program. The basic I idea is that I have a
> function which needs to be run using a queue of data. Early on I
> specified my function needed to only accept basic parameters ( no
> postional *a
rh0dium a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Below is a basic threading program. The basic I idea is that I have a
> function which needs to be run using a queue of data. Early on I
> specified my function needed to only accept basic parameters ( no
> postional *args or *kwargs ) but now I am re-writing it an
Hi all,
Below is a basic threading program. The basic I idea is that I have a
function which needs to be run using a queue of data. Early on I
specified my function needed to only accept basic parameters ( no
postional *args or *kwargs ) but now I am re-writing it and I want to
accept these. Is
11 matches
Mail list logo
